<div dir="ltr">Dear Community,<div>You would notice that we Co-chairs decided to back off when the direction of discussion moved towards proposing a policy. However, it seems we are deviating again. This mailing list or PDWG has no power to determine who is to right or wrong on this issue and therefore posting issues on who to blame or not on here is a total distraction, a waste of time and should be considered as spam. There are other mailing lists where the blame game can be discussed. At this point, we would like to issue a final warning <b>specifically for the blame thing (directly or indirectly) or mentioning the names of any individual or a company</b>. We do not mind having the discussion around policies in a constructive manner but definitely without names or an individual or a company. Am sorry to say but we have no choice <b>but to moderate the email of anyone doing otherwise after this email</b>.</div><div>Thank you </div><div>Co-Chair </div><div>PDWG </div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:35 AM Noah <<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz" target="_blank">noah@neo.co.tz</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Paul,</div><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:22 AM Paul Wollner <<a href="mailto:paulw@wollner.za.net" target="_blank">paulw@wollner.za.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I feel that SEACOM neglected their duty to remove these objects when the client's contract came to an end. As the ISP created the records in the first place, the records should have been updated or deleted by them too. <br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>From the data posted by Arnaud and Owen, the route object records for the Cloud Innovation Limited prefix156.241.3.0/24 in question are those created as recently as 4th March 2020 by Mattew Chan of HonKong Link Infinity Limited on the RADB IRR database using AS37353 again to originate the prefix. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Surely, this does not look like a mistake if indeed the contract with the customer was terminated as far back as December 2020.<br></div><div><br></div><div><div><br><img src="cid:ii_kas0330c2" alt="link infinity.png" width="520" height="298"></div><div><br></div></div><div>The route object as seen on the data presented by Arnaud and Owen has a change log that indicates "
<strong>changed: <a href="mailto:matthew.chan@hgc.com.hk" target="_blank">matthew.chan@hgc.com.hk</a> 20200304</strong>"</div><div>which means it was created on 04-03-2020 two months since December 2019.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I believe Owen has indicated that he is following up the matter with their customer so that it's fixed and those records cleared from RADB.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,<br></div><div>Noah<br></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
<br>
<div><a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng" style="font-size:1.3em" target="_blank">Website</a><span style="font-size:1.3em">,</span><span style="font-size:1.3em"> </span><span style="font-size:1.3em"><a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin" target="_blank">Weekly Bulletin</a> <a href="http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" target="_blank">UGPortal</a> <a href="https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" target="_blank">PGPortal</a></span></div><div><br></div>