<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 26, 2019, at 10:33 , Fernando Frediani <<a href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com" class="">fhfrediani@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
<div class=""><p class="">Hello Jordi</p><p class="">The text seems fine despite the change of wording on some parts,
at the end they means about the same thing. I have 2 points to
note:</p><p class="">- on 5.7.6 it says "information permitted by the source or
recipient". Although there is minimum mandatory information that
must be published, I understand the wording allow the RIR to
publish extra information or notes about the transaction ? How
likely is that to happen and what examples of information would be
that ? Could you clarify a bit further.<br class=""></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Entities who wish to support price transparency may be willing to publish that information.</div><div>Entities may be willing to provide additional information to the community about their purpose in obtaining/releasing resources and/or any other data which might be of interest to researchers, policy analysts, etc. in the future.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>In terms of likelihood, I suspect it will seldom be utilized, but I see zero benefit to closing the door on it in policy.<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">
</p><p class="">- On 5.7.7.2 there is a possibility, should the staff finds a
transaction suspicious, to escalate it for the Board for a final
decision. I normally think this type of individual thing should
not end up in the Board, but internally inside the staff in a well
defined appeal process because they are staff decisions (e.g:
appeal to the Manager, Director, CEO, etc). The Board should only
be involved in something that affects several members or a number
of organizations (for example to preemptively suspend a policy
that may be damaging the RIR or the Community, etc). The same way
the Board can always issue statements for staff on certain topics
and procedures but always in a more generic way.<br class=""></p></div></div></blockquote><div>I would prefer an escalation staff->manager->CEO->board, but I’m not going to get overly fussed about the current state of the policy.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Personally, I think that 5.7.7.2 should be unnecessary as it’s more of an operational matter than a policy issue, but again, not overly bothered about it.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Owen</div><div><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">
</p><p class="">Best regards<br class="">
Fernando Frediani<br class="">
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/11/2019 14:58, JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:DDCBE6BB-7589-4633-B395-12A09B28E65B@consulintel.es" class="">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hi all,
Find attached a new version of the proposal "IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope)".
As usual, I've considered the inputs received.
I've also prepared a diff with the previous version:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.diffchecker.com/azpn4DK0">https://www.diffchecker.com/azpn4DK0</a>
Thanks!
Regards,
Jordi
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theipv6company.com/">http://www.theipv6company.com</a>
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
</pre>
<br class="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>