<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Right Jordi, I also see on that way. But the most important is
that staff also understands the same way the technical
justifications for organizations to receive an ASN whenever they
feel like becoming an Autonomous Systems even if they have a
single upstream. It is good for them and it is good for the RIR as
well.</p>
<p>Best regards<br>
Fernando Frediani<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/11/2019 12:56, JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:838C6EB9-B115-42A4-8981-44692FD37AF2@consulintel.es">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Cuerpo en alfa";
panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo Car";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.jsx-406281813
{mso-style-name:jsx-406281813;}
span.HTMLconformatoprevioCar
{mso-style-name:"HTML con formato previo Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EstiloCorreo22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Hi Fernando,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">I think they read the same, as explained by
Owen. I asked him about that when he proposed that text and
I thought about that many times.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">I think it is clear that if you have a single
upstream provider and ask you for a public ASN, it is a
technical requirement for *<b>that connection</b>*.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">The “or” with the rest of the sentence mean
that “both” are choices.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Note that was the main motivation to have this
policy change (single upstream, no other peerings).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Jordi<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">@jordipalet<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">El 25/11/19
16:44, "Fernando Frediani" <<a
href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">fhfrediani@gmail.com</a>>
escribió:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p style="margin-left:35.4pt">Hello Jordi<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-left:35.4pt">The change you made on 7.2.2 from
"<span class="jsx-406281813">Single interconnection, with a
provider that requires a public" to "Show a unique routing
policy or demonstrate a technical need for a coordinated
globally unique" means different things in my view and may
make things slightly more difficult for organizations to
receive an ASN.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span class="jsx-406281813">When
it says "show a unique routing policy" doesn't necessarily
mean two Transit providers (it could be an IX, a private
peering to another ASN, etc), but excludes the possibility
to have an ASN with a single Transit Upstream. On the second
part that says "demonstrate a technical need for a
coordinated globally unique ASN" what kind of technical need
could for example be acceptable to justify to have an ASN
with a single Transit Upstream provider (have their own
assigned IP space ?) ?</span><br>
<span class="jsx-406281813">My concern is not to exclude de
possibility for organizations to have an ASN even if they
have a single interconnection with their Transit Upstream.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span class="jsx-406281813">Could
you clarify this please ?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span class="jsx-406281813">Thanks</span><br>
<span class="jsx-406281813">Fernando Frediani</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">On 25/11/2019
08:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">Hi all,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">Find attached a new version of the proposal "Multihoming not required for ASN", following the latest inputs in the list.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">I've also prepared an online diff of the changes to the proposed policy text, so it is easy to track:<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><a href="https://www.diffchecker.com/omm6xj7m" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.diffchecker.com/omm6xj7m</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">Regards,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">Jordi<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">@jordipalet<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">**********************************************<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">IPv4 is over<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">Are you ready for the new Internet ?<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><a href="http://www.theipv6company.com" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">The IPv6 Company<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt">RPD mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:35.4pt"><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theipv6company.com">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be
privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>