<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"></p>
<div>Sander,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>You chose to not positively impact the history being written for AFRINIC. You now persist in denying AFRINIC community the ability, like other RIRs to enforce accountability, best practices and adopt an INR review policy.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Why do you want to see responses to the fanciful points on a policy proposal which you buried long ago?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is a PDP working group where participants are expected to discuss and provide suggestions and texts to improve proposals. Please bring texts and suggestions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As done since the inception of the proposal in May 2016 and throughout, authors will comment on all pertinent suggestions.</div>
<br>
<p></p>
<div><br>
</div>
Marcus<br>
<br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, April 10, 2019 1:45 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Marcus K. G. Adomey<br>
<b>Cc:</b> rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [rpd] RPD : Prolicy proposal "Internet Number Resources review by AFRINIC" informations update</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hello Marcus,<br>
<br>
> Op 10 apr. 2019, om 15:12 heeft Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey@hotmail.com> het volgende geschreven:<br>
> <br>
> When I started reading the reaction of Owen on this policy, I was tempted to respond to him in line but after reading the entire email, few issues are worth being pointed out.<br>
> <br>
> 1 – his inability to distinguish between policy and implementation procedure,<br>
> 2 – the irrelevant comments about the format which have no bearings of the substance of the policy, and finally<br>
> 3 – his incoherence regarding need for this policy.<br>
> <br>
> The most outrageous in the above is the third point. Although he claimed that the policy is unnecessary, he was at the same time making suggestions on how the authors can make the proposal better.<br>
<br>
These are all ad-hominem statements. Please take them elsewhere.<br>
<br>
I would like to see some replies to the actual content of Owen's message.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Sander<br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>