<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Hi Ish,</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Thank you for the links.</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I have never seen such a condescending presentation!</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The presenter, from the very beginning is shutting the door for any possibility of continued criticism, because the authors decided the policy should go through and anything else is unacceptable in their views.</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The response given to the first commenters, "tell us how to modify it, that's all, or you do not have a case, please!" just that is scandalous and a shameful way of handling policy discussions, who made that reply!</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Second speaker being ganged up by speakers from the room and then from the AFRINIC staff on stage on a technicality!</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Second speaker was being attacked for using incorrect terminology and therefore no credits given to his voice...what a warm welcome to AFRINIC public session, a community where we have a problem with too many incubbents and not enough new fresh voices and ideas!</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Meanwhile AFRINIC's  lawyer speaks of "what we feel we can do", AFRINIC cannot feel, it either has the right by mandate to act according to their mandate as given by ICANN, then  by the AFRINIC community and by the laws governing its status in Mauritius, but in no way a lawyer should speak and say something is a matter of "feeling" in regards of what their organization can or cannot do, feelings get you in trouble!</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Overall, I honestly cannot see how this policy could be passed to last call based on the last public session's feedback.</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I understand the outrage seen on the list.</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Regards,<br />Dabu</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> </div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">03.12.2018, 03:52, "Ish Sookun" <ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu>:</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> Hi Dabu,</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> On 11/30/18 9:22 PM, Dabu Sifiso wrote:</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">>>  Does anyone have any link to the session where this was discussed now?</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">>>  I read all the opposition emails, but I didn't see the session where the</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">>>  chairs declared consensus and no emails were sent by them yet to</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">>>  announce last call.</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">>>  I would like to make my own mind on what happened in the room.</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> You can watch the PDWG Chairs decision here:</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> https://youtu.be/pknK8vjbY5k?t=679</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> The whole discussion of the Internet Number Resources Review proposal</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> happened here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL471V0cV_s</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> Regards,</div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">> Ish Sookun</div>