<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=ES link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=ES-TRAD style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Hi Seun,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=ES-TRAD style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I’m not sure if you have read the proposal, as I’m not talking at all about sub-allocations, but sub-assignments.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>So, there must be some confusion here.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Please, read again and let me know if I can help to clarify any doubts you have.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black'><br></span><span lang=ES-TRAD style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black'>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=ES-TRAD style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Jordi<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=ES-TRAD style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=ES-TRAD style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>De: </span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com><br><b>Fecha: </b>miércoles, 9 de mayo de 2018, 16:45<br><b>Para: </b>Dewole Ajao <dewole@forum.org.ng><br><b>CC: </b>rpd <rpd@afrinic.net><br><b>Asunto: </b>Re: [rpd] New Policy Proposal Received - “Clarification on IPv6 sub-assignments (AFPUB-2018-V6-002-DRAFT01)"<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a name="_MailOriginalBody">Dear Jordi,<o:p></o:p></a></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>Thanks for your presentation at the face 2 face. Just to bring to your attention the faq[1] on sub-allocation.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>"</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:#333333;background:#EEEEEE'>A sub-allocation is a block of IP address space given by an LIR to ISPs (LIR's customers) for the purpose of subsequent distribution"</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>Since there is already a clear definition for sub-allocation, it seem to me that just changing the word sub-assigned in the current policy to sub-allocated, may be a neater way to address your concern/intention better. That could make things shorter and brief while still reducing opportunity for possible ambiguity which I think your current proposed text may bring.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>Regards<br>1. </span><a href="https://www.afrinic.net/en/faq/members"><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>https://www.afrinic.net/en/faq/members</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>Sent from my mobile<br>Kindly excuse brevity and typos<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, 5:22 PM Dewole Ajao <</span><a href="mailto:dewole@forum.org.ng" target="_blank"><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>dewole@forum.org.ng</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>Good day AFRINIC PDWG Members,<br><br>We have received a new policy proposal as follows.<br><br>Proposal: Clarification on IPv6 sub-assignments<br>ID: AFPUB-2018-V6-002-DRAFT01<br>Author: Jordi Palet Martinez | jordi.palet[at]</span><a href="http://theipv6company.com" target="_blank"><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>theipv6company.com</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'> <br><br>The proposal contents are published at </span><a href="https://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2321-clarification-on-ipv6-sub-assignments" target="_blank"><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>https://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2321-clarification-on-ipv6-sub-assignments</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><br><br>Please take some time to go through the proposal contents and provide your feedback.<br><br>Thank you.<br><br>PDWG Co-chairs<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>RPD mailing list<br></span><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>RPD@afrinic.net</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><br></span><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank"><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</span><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'><o:p></o:p></span></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='mso-bookmark:_MailOriginalBody'>_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><br>**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
http://www.consulintel.es<br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
</body></html>