<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">That is not accurate, the MAXIMUM an organisation can get in a 24 month period in phase 1 is a /18 under this policy, as per this:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#FF6600;background:#EEEEEE">5.4.6.1 Within any 24-month period during Exhaustion Phase 1, an organization may receive one or more allocations/assignments totalling the
equivalent of a /18.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#FF6600;background:#EEEEEE"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That creates a fundamental problem for any organisation that requires a lot more than a /18 in 24 months – and a /18 is a tiny amount of space – that’s probably a months burn rate for us at the moment. So what happens once I’ve hit 100%
and can’t get anymore? Where do I get space since this community won’t pass a transfer policy that gives me access to the global secondary markets?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Andrew<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> Ornella GANKPA [mailto:honest1989@gmail.com]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 04 January 2018 16:57<br>
<b>To:</b> mje@posix.co.za; rpd <rpd@afrinic.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [rpd] Appeal against softlanding-bis declaration of consensus<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Mark<br>
<br>
Again this is not true. It is explicitely said in the policy that any<br>
organization (regardless of its size) can be allocated /18 within a 24<br>
month period during exhaustion phase 1 and /22 during exhaustion phase<br>
2. Anyone can always get more allocation as long as they justify 90%<br>
utilization. I fail to see how it prevents growth for anyone. However it<br>
does ensure good management of our ressources.<br>
<br>
The policy doesn't punish success. In any case, it encourages carefully<br>
planned growth<br>
<br>
Why would anyone disagree with that? Is IPv6 not the common sense option<br>
for any growth plan?<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Honest Ornella GANKPA<br>
<br>
Le 04/01/2018 à 11:36, Mark Elkins a écrit :<br>
> Thus, by extension, the revised policy is generally harmful to larger<br>
> LIR's. They need larger blocks in order to grow, which this revision<br>
> of the policy does not allow. This policy is therefore discriminatory<br>
> against larger (which probably implies more successful) LIR's. Thus,<br>
> the policy harms success (and larger LIR's who need more space).<br>
<br>
---<br>
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>