<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi Seun,<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 31/05/2017 à 15:14, Seun Ojedeji a
      écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD_dc6ibc_Z8NgGT=RR0+=6vZi659=1P+wVtD9g5me9HQc8-jw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">Hello,
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Here are summary of my comments in 3 steps:</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <b>Thanks for your comments….. inline….</b><br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD_dc6ibc_Z8NgGT=RR0+=6vZi659=1P+wVtD9g5me9HQc8-jw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">
          <div dir="auto">- Start with the current PDP</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
     <b>We do not intend to patch the existing PDP. Intent is to work
      with community to design an updated PDP which takes into
      consideration the lessons learned from the past 7 years experience
      with the current process. A new PDP which follows BCPs and is well
      adapted for our region is the outcome we hope for.</b><br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD_dc6ibc_Z8NgGT=RR0+=6vZi659=1P+wVtD9g5me9HQc8-jw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div dir="auto">
          <div dir="auto">- Incoporate the consensus section of your
            proposal (3.4.0) <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <b>The Rough Consensus  mechanism as proposed by PDP-bis cannot be
      incorporated in current PDP as it requires different process in
      conducting working group’s works and advancing proposals. </b><b><br>
    </b><b><br>
    </b><b>In PDP-bis, proposals follow well defined steps, and mature,
      before getting to PPM for Rough Consensus. Rough consensus is
      achieved after major objections and/or minor objections are
      resolved/addressed by working group as  proposals progress.</b><br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD_dc6ibc_Z8NgGT=RR0+=6vZi659=1P+wVtD9g5me9HQc8-jw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div dir="auto">
          <div dir="auto">- Edit the current PDP to allow consensus to
            abandon a proposal - That will just require adding option to
            reject/support a proposal in section 3.4 of the CPM</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <b>With PDP-bis, once a proposal is adopted by the working group,
      the initiators grant all rights to the community and the proposal 
      becomes community document. It is then up to working group to
      decide wether to reject, abandon or support a policy.  Provision
      is made for this in PDP-BIS</b><br>
    <br>
    <b>Regards</b><br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Honest Ornella GANKPA</pre>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD_dc6ibc_Z8NgGT=RR0+=6vZi659=1P+wVtD9g5me9HQc8-jw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div dir="auto">
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Regards</div>
          <br>
          <div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">Sent from
            my Mobile<br>
            Kindly excuse brevity and typos</div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On May 29, 2017 18:03, "Dewole Ajao"
          <<a href="mailto:dewole@forum.org.ng"
            moz-do-not-send="true">dewole@forum.org.ng</a>> wrote:<br
            type="attribution">
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Policy
            proposal and Staff analysis are at <a
href="https://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2083-afrinic-policy-development-process-bis"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.afrinic.net/en/<wbr>community/policy-development/<wbr>policy-proposals/2083-afrinic-<wbr>policy-development-process-bis</a><br>
            <br>
            Please reply within this thread to submit your comments.<br>
            <br>
            Regards,<br>
            PDWG Co-Chairs.<br>
            <br>
            ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
            RPD mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
            <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  <br /> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
        <tr>
      <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 18px;"><a href="https://www.avast.com/fr-fr/c-malware?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclients&utm_term=oa-2335-v2-c" target="_blank"><img src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/2016/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange_184x116-v1.png" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" /></a></td>
                <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 17px; color: #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Vérification des <a href="https://www.avast.com/fr-fr/c-malware?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclients&utm_term=oa-2335-v2-c" target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">malwares</a> effectuée          </td>
        </tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>