<br><br>On Friday, March 3, 2017, David Hilario <<a href="mailto:d.hilario@laruscloudservice.net">d.hilario@laruscloudservice.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">As the author of policy prop-118 to APNIC, I would like to inform the
AFRINIC community of a topic that could also become relevant in this region
too:<span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"><span lang="FR" style="font-size:9.5pt"><a href="https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-118/" style="font-size:9.5pt" target="_blank">https://www.apnic.net/<wbr>community/policy/proposals/<wbr>prop-118/</a></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">The concept and the text are not originally mine, the no need policy
comes from the discussion of the first transfer policy at APNIC, the concept
was abandoned when ARIN introduced its policy of inter-RIR transfer, since ARIN
can only transfer to a registry with a "need base policy".<span></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is simply absurd. </div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:9.5pt">Prop-118 received a lot of support both in the room and in the mailing
list, with only one strong objection, but due to a problem with APNIC's remote
participation software, </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-repeat:initial"></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>We follow APNIC discussion. Do not mislead the community. There was no problem with their software. You tried to cheat by putting fake participants to vote for your policy and you were caught.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Your questionable ethic puts me at a position to oppose any policy you introduce in our region.</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div dir="ltr"></div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote>