<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 9, 2016, at 08:17 , Noah <<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz" class="">noah@neo.co.tz</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><p dir="ltr" class="">On 9 Nov 2016 01:45, "Owen DeLong" <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" class="">owen@delong.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
> I think that the community’s obligations to protect your future developments from early obsolescence are past at this point.<br class="">
></p><p dir="ltr" class="">We have countries in the Afrinic Region that are faced with years of civil unrest and political conflict and are yet to be pacified whose Internet development is at its lowest levels today and could require obsolete IPv4 resources in the nearest future to take off.</p><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Then they should get that space from the proposed “new entrant” pool, which if you will recall, I did not object to.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>It still does _NOT_ justify the creation of a “reserved for unknown purposes” pool which is what I have repeatedly opposed and continue to oppose here.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Owen</div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>