<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0,
0); font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 16px;" text="#000000"
bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/Oct/16 09:24, Amreesh Phokeer
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2EE2FDEA-07F3-49B7-ACCB-CBA068798F51@afrinic.net"
style="border-left: 2px solid #009900 !important; border-right:
2px solid #009900 !important; padding: 0px 15px 0px 15px; margin:
8px 2px; background-color: null !important; color: null
!important;">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div class="">Questions to the community:</div>
<div class="">1. Should AFRINIC implement operational checks that
are run periodically and members are informed about the status
of their domain objects. After X reminders, if domain object
still contain lame NS records, domain object are removed.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would start with this, but relax the "removal" action if
unresponsive, as I am not sure whether the reason for a lack of
response is obvious or clear.<br>
<br>
That said, after gaining experience on this, I suppose we could have
more reliable information to guarantee removal of the delegation
without causing any real pain to anyone.<br>
<br>
Certainly, members being in the know that their delegations aren't
working correctly is a massive step in the right direction.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2EE2FDEA-07F3-49B7-ACCB-CBA068798F51@afrinic.net"
style="border-left: 2px solid #009900 !important; border-right:
2px solid #009900 !important; padding: 0px 15px 0px 15px; margin:
8px 2px; background-color: null !important; color: null
!important;">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">2. Should the AFRINIC community enforce lame
delegation removal through a policy.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'd be keen to review such a policy.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>