<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi SM<br class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Daniel Shaw <<a href="mailto:daniel@afrinic.net" class="">daniel@afrinic.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">SM,<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 29 Aug 2016, at 12:47 PM, <a href="mailto:sm+afrinic@elandsys.com" class="">sm+afrinic@elandsys.com</a> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">According to a Research & Development Support Engineer [1] from Afrinic "Les opérateurs de télécommunications mauriciens ne sont pas préparés à passer à lIPv6". According to the President of the IPv6 Forum: "Rien na été fait à Maurice pour déployer lIPv6”.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">These are opinions - not data.<br class=""></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div><div class="">Let me add that this article is not authoritative and has neither been endorsed nor authorised by AFRINIC. </div><div class="">The statements are baseless as no hard facts have been provided.</div></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""> According to the data on 6spots there are eight LIRs in that country with IPv6 and over 50% IPv6 "announcements”.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Yes. That is the data from the WHOIS DB and global BGP.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Would it be possible for you to ask the Research & Development Support Engineer for advice as it may be easier for a person sitting in the same office as you to explain how to verify the information for that country?<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Data on 6pots is based on a) IPv6 allocation data, which you can find yourself on <a href="http://ftp.afrinic.net" class="">ftp.afrinic.net</a> and BGP data from <a href="http://archive.routeviews.org" class="">archive.routeviews.org</a><br class=""></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>That’s correct. So either one or both of the two sources of information are unreliable? Can you point what exactly is unreliable?</div><div><br class=""></div><div><a href="http://bgp.he.net/country/MU" class="">http://bgp.he.net/country/MU</a> says it sees 18 ASNs out of which 13 are advertising IPv6 space.</div><div>To me this seems very close to what 6spots is mentioning 12 out of 18 (as at 2016-08-01).</div><div><br class=""></div><div>I would suggest that you verify your information first before making wrong statements.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><br class=""><br class="">I believe that perhaps you are confusing allocations and BGP announcements (which is what 6spots collates and graphs), with actual usage at end-points, CPEs and devices (which is entirely different).<br class=""></div></blockquote><div>This is what I am thinking as well.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><br class="">- Daniel<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>