<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Alain<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Glad to see we are in such close agreement.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I think this may be a drafting issue - where tightening up the language will avoid doubt.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">For example:</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 30 May 2016, at 15:28, ALAIN AINA <<a href="mailto:aalain@trstech.net" class="">aalain@trstech.net</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div class="" style="font-family: ArialMT; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><div class="">Section 3.c read</div><div class="">================</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> Reported:</div><div class=""><p data-kwik="91" class="">The members have requested the audit themselves or there has been a community complaint made against them that requires investigation.</p><div class="">=============</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">What makes you draw such conclusion ?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>Now I read the words “requires investigation” as placing an obligation on staff.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Now if you use words like “warrants investigation” or “justifies investigation” I would not have an issue. That way the role of staff is clearer. However that qualifier should not apply to an own initiative audit request. So I would split this into two sentences.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">From previous experience the identity of the complainer is incredibly important. I have seen competitors using inspection rights to cripple businesses under the guise of the health of the industry. I would give staff the discretion to consider the identity of the complainant.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Mike</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>