<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>I think it is simply in the translation to remove subjectivity. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Can be discussed but I think can be solved at governance. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Byelaws are affected by the basic human flow in our design. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A clear translation of expectations would help future noncoms. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As McTim mentioned he did this role earlier without any issues and community and board were happy. but of recent issues have arisen and thus also impacted on the trust issue. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So looks like as we grow those clear lines need to be drawn. </div>
<div><br>
<div>Badru Ntege</div>
<div>Sent from my Mobile</div>
</div>
<div><br>
On 26 Jul 2015, at 10:35, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p dir="ltr">Hi,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Just so it's clear, I understand the bylaw permits the board to receive/require report from nomcom and either put an approval/disapproval stamp. I also understand board is only to look at whether nomcom followed its processes and not necessarily
whether nomcom candidates are the ones liked by board.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I don't think there is public information that confirms the later has happened yet and will be good to know if it has.</p>
<p dir="ltr">That said, if there is need to change those processes, it is not what the governance committee should do. It is rather a change in the bylaw and will require the entire community member engagement.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 26 Jul 2015 7:37 am, "Badru Ntege" <<a href="mailto:badru.ntege@nftconsult.com">badru.ntege@nftconsult.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
McTim<br>
<br>
> On 26 Jul 2015, at 02:20, McTim <<a href="mailto:dogwallah@gmail.com">dogwallah@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> As a former NomCom Chair, I can tell you that this is not the case. When I sat on the Nominating Committee, the Board had zero input into deliberations. The elections and Nominations processes are reported to the Board, but the Board does not provide "oversight".<br>
<br>
Just a note to say that things have changed drastically from my last experience board believes it has oversight and also some level approval powers of the slate.<br>
<br>
Just some more work for the governance committee.<br>
<br>
I will keep my inputs very short less I'm accused again of having negative intentions. _______________________________________________<br>
members-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:members-discuss@afrinic.net">members-discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/members-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/members-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>