<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/Jun/15 21:37, Lu Heng wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAAvCx3j3jpdf+7MP7w+1ejjmh2QjLmtd4zwvR8HG=bb1fCRopg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
</font></span></blockquote>
</div>
I respect your tech expertise, however, from what I
understand, any major change to core router at cooperate level
does require a complicated process. And there are technical
and communication cost involved as well.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Some networks are run simpler.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAAvCx3j3jpdf+7MP7w+1ejjmh2QjLmtd4zwvR8HG=bb1fCRopg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">I would agree make life simpler for
IXPs as they are one of very fundamental part of the internet.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
It is not an issue of making life simpler, it is an option to
consider some of the practical issues of route server
implementations. It is not like folk are refusing progress.<br>
<br>
Let's not try to infer that we should "save the poor people from
themselves", please...<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>