<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Though totally not in support of the policy of allocating by numbers. If this can make us start looking at this policy to make it more acceptable </div><div><br></div><br><div><div>On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Sunday Folayan <<a href="mailto:sfolayan@gmail.com">sfolayan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><p dir="ltr"><font color="#000000"> </font>> ii) his focus on south region without any provision of equity; </p><p dir="ltr">This statement has been addressed over and over. Indeed it cares more for the other regions with lower entry barrier. We can lower the ratio to 3:1, 2:1 even 0.5:1 if you will .... but you are not even proposing anything!!</p><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I would propose 2:1 and would also be more stringent in that the entity must have infrastructure in place and also an existing or planned uplink to the internet within 2 months of allocation.</div><div><br></div><div>Also i would expect stricter due diligence since we are proposing very subjective measures and criteria for allocation.</div><div><br></div><div>regards</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div></div></body></html>