[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs communication regarding observed behavioron AFPUB-2026-ASN-001-DRAFT02

[Seun Ojedeji]

Frank who will declare that the argument was won? Unless the declarant is
also Claude and not one of the Co-Chairs.

Nevertheless, our Co-Chairs who is empowered to moderate rpd list would
have risen to the occasion to avoid getting up to 5k messages of such in
the first place :-)  Perhaps some wording should be included in the CoC to
cover such scenario as well.

Regards
----
Sent from my mobile
kindly excuse typos

On Thu, 23 Jul 2026, 6:38 am Frank Habicht, <geier at geier.ne.tz> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 7/22/2026 8:53 PM, Mike Burns via RPD wrote:
> [snip]
> > I say, who cares if Claude is posting, or ChatGPT, or any other AI.
> >
> > Give them a seat at the table and address their arguments.
> >
> > Giving them a veneer of humanness through identity appropriation is not
> > the way forward.
> >
> > Again, I am interested in hearing other perspectives.
>
> I'd like to hear what should happen if then two Claudes are arguing at
> 5000 email per hour and eventually one Claude wins the argument, and
> AfriNIC will have to implement a policy that e.g. bans you from posting
> here?
>
> Frank
> Devil's advocate
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260723/fe941f97/attachment.html>