[rpd] Policy supremacy

[Tshepo Masuku]

Hi Ben,

Yes, both addresses are mine. I moved from the Gmail account to Outlook and should have made that clear.

A change of email address does not create a second participant or a second position. Please treat both addresses as one contributor; I will use the Outlook address going forward.

An email address is a contact point, not a test of legitimacy. My contributions should be assessed on their substance.

Regards,
Tshepo

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: ben.roberts at frinic.net <ben.roberts at afrinic.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 18:18:29
To: Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com>
Cc: rpd at afrinic.net <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [rpd] Policy supremacy

Tshepo,
 Ok I will take Gugu out of this line of conversation.

I see you are Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com>

Are you related to the other Tshepo Masuku <tshepomasuku16 at gmail.com> who has also been frequently posting on this list?

Kind Regards
Ben

Get Outlook for Mac<https://aka.ms/GetOutlookForMac>
From: Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 at 18:10
To: ben.roberts at frinic.net <ben.roberts at afrinic.net>; Gugu Dhlamini <gugudhlamini343 at gmail.com>
Cc: rpd at afrinic.net <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [rpd] Policy supremacy

Hi Ben,

I speak only for myself. I reviewed the message, agree with it, and stand behind it. Similar wording does not prove shared identity or automation.

If you have evidence of impersonation, submit it to the co-chairs. Otherwise, please address the policy rather than speculate about participants.

I will not continue this side discussion.

Regards,
Tshepo

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: ben.roberts at frinic.net <ben.roberts at afrinic.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 18:02:36
To: Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com>; Gugu Dhlamini <gugudhlamini343 at gmail.com>
Cc: rpd at afrinic.net <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [rpd] Policy supremacy

So you used the same prompt into the same AI tool and emailed the same reply ?  Excuse my skepticism, but are you the same person with different personas ?  Or just AI agents running the same script ?

I think thats a fair question to ask given the circumstances?

Kind Regards,

Ben

Get Outlook for Mac<https://aka.ms/GetOutlookForMac>
From: Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 at 17:55
To: Ben Roberts - AfriNIC <ben.roberts at afrinic.net>; Gugu Dhlamini <gugudhlamini343 at gmail.com>
Cc: rpd at afrinic.net <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [rpd] Policy supremacy

Hi Ben,

The similarity is not mysterious. We addressed the same phrase, and drafting assistance can produce similar wording. I reviewed my message, agree with it, and stand behind it.

Your profile provides context, but it does not confer a higher status in an open PDP. If affiliation disclosure is to be required, it must be a clear rule applied equally to everyone.

I will not engage further in authorship speculation.

Regards,
Tshepo


Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Ben Roberts - AfriNIC <ben.roberts at afrinic.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 17:47:59
To: Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com>; Gugu Dhlamini <gugudhlamini343 at gmail.com>
Cc: rpd at afrinic.net <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [rpd] Policy supremacy

Gugu and Tshepo,

Perhaps you can explain to us how you ended up thinking of near identical opening sentences to your emails ?

“Introductions can be helpful, but they are voluntary. They should not become an informal test of who qualifies as a “genuine” community member.”

“ introductions can provide context, but they should not become a test of whether someone is a “genuine” community member.”

By way of introduction, my profile can be found here. https://btw.media/en/governance/rir-watchdog/afrinic/benjamin-mark-roberts
Kind Regards
Ben




Sent from my iPhone

On 21 Jul 2026, at 17:15, Tshepo Masuku <TshepoMasuku26 at hotmail.com> wrote:



Hi Ben,

Introductions can provide context, but they should not become a test of whether someone is a “genuine” community member.

An open process cannot presume that familiar participants belong while newcomers must prove themselves. If affiliation disclosure is important, it should be a clear and equal rule covering everyone, including employers, clients, funding, and organisational interests.

Until such a rule exists, contributions should be judged by their substance and conduct, not by whether the established circle recognises the sender.

Regards,
Tshepo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260721/9cb75ff2/attachment-0001.html>