[rpd] Writing tools

[Gugu Dhlamini]

Hi Sami,

The concern is not reasonable moderation. It is that AI use is being raised
mainly against participants who oppose these policies, as though the tool
makes their objections illegitimate.

If anyone floods the list, moderate the flooding. Apply that rule equally,
regardless of viewpoint or drafting method. A real participant using AI to
translate, edit, or organise their own position is not grounds for
exclusion.

An open PDP cannot embrace technology for registry operations while
condemning it when unfamiliar participants use it to speak. That would be
gatekeeping, not consensus.

Regards,
Gugu



On Tue, 21 Jul 2026, 10:48 am Sami Ait Ali Oulahcen via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It's been really difficult to follow the list this past 2/3 days. And I
> imagine I'm not alone.
> I fully agree on moderating the AI madness. Otherwise, it'll dissuade many
> folks from following/participating.
>
> Regards,
> Sami
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Silber" <silber.mike at gmail.com>
> To: "rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy" <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2026 4:40:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Writing tools
>
> A useful discussion - thank you
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 5:17 PM Mike Burns via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Yes, the language is a clear tell of AI  usage, but flowery language
> alone
> > is not swamping the list.
>
> I don't want to hijack the AS-SET discussion, so thank you for the new
> > subject line.
> >
>
> Agreed
>
> >
> > Now, sometimes  and unfortunately, I can use vague and flowery language
> > myself, so I would advise you to treat the AI stuff like the human stuff.
> > Ignore it if it's too vague or flowery to serve as a good argument, and
> > you have clearly laid out the two arguments in your last two lines.
> > Hopefully the list will show judgement and treat clear and concise
> > arguments better than vague ones.
> > And then the AI posts, if they want to be successful, will avoid the
> > purple prose.
> >
>
> I think it goes beyond flowery language.
>
> I am concerned that this is a precedent for AI generated DDoS attacks on
> the PDP and I do think we should have some light touch guidelines. I
> suspect that one of the reasons for the AI-slop flood is not just to try
> convince anyone of the value or legitimacy of their views but rather to
> overwhelm and frustrate other participants and cause them to withdraw from
> participation.
>
> Accordingly, I suggest we don't simply leave this to the co-chairs to
> determine on a case by case basis, but rather set some guidelines under
> which measures can be taken to avoid AI DDoS.
>
> Anyway - just my ZAR0,02 which is not worth much
>
> Regards
>
> Mike S
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260721/dbfc4849/attachment.html>