[rpd] [Last Call] Draft Policy Proposal ? Hierarchical Names for New AS-SETs (AFPUB-2026-ASN-001-DRAFT02)

[Frank Habicht]

Hi,

On 7/19/2026 11:29 PM, Thulisile Mazomba wrote:
> 
> Hi Frank,
> 
> You appear to be treating your disagreement with an objection as proof 
> that no technical objection exists.
> 
> The proposal prevents one naming collision. It does not establish the 
> correctness of the routing data attached to that name,

The proposal does not fix *all* problems. and it doesn't claim to do so.
It creates an improvement.
I don't agree that it is ok to object just because this proposal does 
not fix *all* problems.

Do you agree it provides improvements?

> nor prove that 
> mandatory registry control is the only proportionate remedy.

it's not intended to prove that.

> 
> Those are technical and policy questions. Declaring them invalid does 
> not resolve them.
They are not good reasons against the proposal.

But some people maybe want to be against the proposal first and then are 
looking for "questions".

Frank