[rpd] Staff impact analysis

[ALAIN AINA]

Dear PDWG,

Would it not be more appropriate for the Working Group to first allow discussions to mature to a certain level of stability before the co‑chairs request an AFRINIC staff analysis?

Section 3.4.1 of the CPM states that:
“the Working Group Chair(s) may request AFRINIC to provide an analysis (technical, financial, legal or other) of the impact of the draft policy proposal.”

—Alain

> On 15 Jun 2026, at 10:03, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> 
> I checked all the draft policy proposals at https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals and could not find stay impact analysis on them. 
> 
> Could you kindly have the policy liaisons look into this as ppm is right on our door step. 
> 
> Regards
> 
> ----
> Sent from my mobile
> kindly excuse typos 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260615/4fafb9a5/attachment-0001.sig>