Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] IPv6 as a criteria in IPv4 Soft Landing AFPUB-2026-v6-001-DRAFT01.

Dorothy Kwamboka dkwambs02 at gmail.com
Thu May 28 14:40:26 UTC 2026


Dear PDWG,

I understand the concern about low IPv6 adoption, but I have real
reservations about making it a condition for IPv4 allocations. The
RIR’s role is to coordinate number resources, not to drive network
migration. Tying IPv4 access to IPv6 deployment turns a resource
policy into a migration mandate, adding cost and complexity for
operators, particularly in emerging markets where IPv4 is still
essential.

The Soft Landing policy already limits supply. Adding a mandatory IPv6
requirement would shift the burden to ordinary operators, while the
benefits flow mainly to registry structures and large vendors. I ask
the PDWG to consider these consequences carefully.

Regards,
Dorothy.

On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 4:58 PM jordi.palet--- via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
> Fully agree. I think my recent response to Theresa provides a bigger context/response.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
> El 28 may 2026, a las 13:44, Jaco Kroon <jaco at uls.co.za> escribió:
>
> Hi Seun,
>
> I don't think anybody at this point in time should become an Afrinic member if they don't deal with reality:  You need to deploy IPv6.
>
> I do agree it shouldn't run stale - but I'd rather see that happening than people don't actively deploy IPv6.
>
> Kind regards,
> Jaco
>
> On 2026/05/28 13:40, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> This proposal looks good to me in principle but I'd like to mention that if this is a first v4 request then perhaps V6 deployment plan requirement should not be mandatory.
>
> While we need people to deploy V6, we also don't want V4 to run stale in AFRINIC's vault, a balanced depletion rate may be good. I fear this proposal may reduce depletion rate of v4 which I know may not be the intent.
>
> I also look forward to reading staff analysis of this proposal especially as it concerns V6 justification implementation
>
> Regards
>
> ----
> Sent from my mobile
> kindly excuse typos
>
>
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2026, 3:05 am Darwin Da Costa, <dacostadarwin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear PDWG,
>>
>> We have received a new draft policy proposal - IPv6 as a criteria in IPv4 Soft Landing ID AFPUB-2026-v6-001-DRAFT01 from author Jordi Palet Martinez. The proposal contents are published at:
>>
>> https://afrinic.net/afpub-2026-v6-001-draft01
>>
>>
>> We encourage you to take some time to go through the proposal contents and  provide feedback as follows:
>>
>> a)Do you support or oppose the proposal?
>>
>> b) If you oppose the proposal, state your reasons?
>>
>> c) Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>>
>> d) What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vincent Ngundi & Darwin Da Costa
>> AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chairs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd



More information about the RPD mailing list