[rpd] IPv6 as a criteria in IPv4 Soft Landing AFPUB-2026-v6-001-DRAFT01.

[Seun Ojedeji]

This proposal looks good to me in principle but I'd like to mention that if
this is a first v4 request then perhaps V6 deployment plan requirement
should not be mandatory.

While we need people to deploy V6, we also don't want V4 to run stale in
AFRINIC's vault, a balanced depletion rate may be good. I fear this
proposal may reduce depletion rate of v4 which I know may not be the intent.

I also look forward to reading staff analysis of this proposal especially
as it concerns V6 justification implementation

Regards

----
Sent from my mobile
kindly excuse typos



On Thu, 28 May 2026, 3:05 am Darwin Da Costa, <dacostadarwin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear PDWG,
>
>
> We have received a new draft policy proposal - IPv6 as a criteria in IPv4
> Soft Landing ID AFPUB-2026-v6-001-DRAFT01 from author Jordi Palet Martinez.
> The proposal contents are published at:
>
>
> https://afrinic.net/afpub-2026-v6-001-draft01
>
>
>
> We encourage you to take some time to go through the proposal contents and
>  provide feedback as follows:
>
>
> a)Do you support or oppose the proposal?
>
>
> b) If you oppose the proposal, state your reasons?
>
>
> c) Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>
>
> d) What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vincent Ngundi & Darwin Da Costa
>
> AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260528/18ad6b4d/attachment.html>