Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Gauging Interest in a possible policy change

jordi.palet at consulintel.es jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed May 27 06:49:24 UTC 2026


Hi Andrew,

A few years ago, in LACNIC we had similar issues with behaviours against the spirit of the equivalent list to this one.

As I was IETF sergeant at arms for the IETF mailing list, and also participate in many other exploders that have AUPs (Acceptable Usage Policy), I used my experience to design a proposal for LACNIC, you can see the last version here:

https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2018-13/language/en

It took a long time to discuss the proposal, and when it was almost reaching consensus (in my opinion), LACNIC decided to make a CoC which somehow superseddes the AUP.

Nevertheless, I still have encountered feelings if an AUP may be also needed in parallel to the CoC, as the CoC is quite generic while the AUP can provide a ore clear path to co-chairs.

So if you reach the conclusion that this is good to have, I’m happy to work with you/others in that, or feel free to use that proposal as a starting point that was discussed during 3 years in a very similar context. 

Regards,
Jordi

@jordipalet


> El 27 may 2026, a las 7:53, Andrew Alston <aa at alstonnetworks.net> escribió:
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I've been giving this a lot of thought and want to gauge interest in adding a policy relating to the code of conduct.
> 
> Effectively, what I foresee is language added to the policy which acts similar to the IETF Notewell, and specifies appropriate/inappropriate conduct both on the PDP List and during PDP meetings.
> 
> Ideally speaking this will also include enforcement actions for the code of conduct, appeal procedures etc. 
> 
> Within the IETF framework for example, disruptive behavior can result in the temporary or permanent loss of posting rights to the list, and such enforcement actions are subject to a robust appeal mechanism.
> 
> Before I start drafting however, I'd like to hear the PDP's thoughts on whether this is worth doing.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260527/9c03f681/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list