[rpd] Gauging Interest in a possible policy change

[Saul Stein]

Hi Andrew,

It’s sad that it’s come to this.

I think a better idea would be  rule that says after x warnings from the co-chairs, you have a 6month period of either moderation or suspension from posting.

That should be in the code of conduct, not a specific policy.

Regards
Saul


From: Andrew Alston <aa at alstonnetworks.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2026 07:53
To: RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: [rpd] Gauging Interest in a possible policy change

Hi Guys,

I've been giving this a lot of thought and want to gauge interest in adding a policy relating to the code of conduct.

Effectively, what I foresee is language added to the policy which acts similar to the IETF Notewell, and specifies appropriate/inappropriate conduct both on the PDP List and during PDP meetings.

Ideally speaking this will also include enforcement actions for the code of conduct, appeal procedures etc.

Within the IETF framework for example, disruptive behavior can result in the temporary or permanent loss of posting rights to the list, and such enforcement actions are subject to a robust appeal mechanism.

Before I start drafting however, I'd like to hear the PDP's thoughts on whether this is worth doing.

Thanks

Andrew

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20260527/7939a615/attachment.html>