[rpd] Pushing IPv6 ? Re: Questions about IP Allocation rate

[Noah]

And to add on Jordi point, we also know that have atleast /24 at bare
minimum or a /22 can come in handly during IPv6 transition especially when
the need for native v6 on users side requires an NAT64 and DNS64 boxes
along them path especially the Gateways facing the legacy Internet.

Cheers,
*.**/noah*


On Tue, 14 Oct 2025, 12:15 pm jordi.palet--- via RPD, <rpd at afrinic.net>
wrote:

> Agree, however, we know very well that a small IPv4 pool (may be a /24 for
> each BGP PoP), is needed for interconnection with IPv4 Internet, as there
> may be still some old apps that require it.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
> El 14 oct 2025, a las 10:46, Owen DeLong via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
> escribió:
>
> Yes, exactly. The continuing presence of an IPv4 free pool at AFRINIC and
> the efforts to keep it from running out are actually counterproductive to
> progress in the African digital economy.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2025, at 01:22, Hendrik Visage <hvisage at hevis.co.za> wrote:
>
>  Question:
>
>  Shouldn’t we rather consider pushing IPv6 deployment assistance across
> Africa? ie. let the rest of the IPv4 go ASAP without much resistance
> instead of making this a begging/pleading/fighting game?
>
> ARIN (North America) & RIPE (Europe) serviced areas are way ahead of IPv6
> roll outs, ‘cause they don’t have any left, and looking at AfriNIC services
> countries, we are still have an abundance of IPv4, so IPv6 percentage roll
> outs are very low, and rathe we should be pushing to mirror the IPv6
> percentage rollout and usage rather than fighting over the few remaining
> IPv4s if we want to grow digital rollouts.
>
> Perhaps even moving to a state of: “You can have IPv6, once you’ve proven
> a complete IPv6 rollout can you get anymore IPv4"
>
> ---
> Hendrik Visage
> Instant messaging: https://t.me/hvisage
>
>
> On 13 Oct 2025, at 16:43, Andrew Alston <aa at alstonnetworks.net> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if there were updated statistics for the amount of space
> allocated in the last 3 years.  In addition to this information regarding
> exactly how much free space is still available in the IPv4 unallocated pool
> (excluding reservations)
>
> I ask this because depending on the allocation rate - we may wish to
> consider revising the soft-landing policy that currently reserves a /12
> worth of ipv4 space for "future uses, as yet unforeseen".
>
> I point out that the soft landing policy was ratified in 2011, and if we
> still, after 14 years, have not been able to articulate a clear reason for
> such a large reservation, I think it's time we look at most, if not all, of
> that /12 back into the main unallocated pool that can be allocated for
> African resource holders that actually need it.
>
> Amongst other reasons, sitting with unallocated, unannounced, reserved
> space like this leaves the space vulnerable to hijacking and malicious use
> or even potential theft.
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ---
>
> Hendrik Visage
>
> hvisage at hevis.co.za
>
>
> HeViS.Co Systems Pty Ltd
>
> https://www.envisage.co.za
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20251014/f6550050/attachment-0001.html>