Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Questions about IP Allocation rate

Noah noah at neo.co.tz
Tue Oct 14 09:10:14 UTC 2025


Hi Ben

Yes lets get us get that data from Afrinic. It would be interesting to know
how many African Govt have Internet Resources or which govt entities have
internet resources in each country.

Cheers,
*.**/noah*


On Tue, 14 Oct 2025, 5:41 am Ben Roberts - AfriNIC, <ben.roberts at afrinic.net>
wrote:

> Ok. What we probably need is to have IP allocation statistics by African
> country. We can ask Afrinic for this to be complied. From that you can work
> out how many IP addresses a country has per capita of population.   Our
> policy setting needs to be guided by data and research, not rumour.
>
> According to this website, Eritrea has just over 5000 IP addresses.
> https://lite.ip2location.com/eritrea-ip-address-ranges This is on the
> extreme low side for a country of nearly 4 million population. Seychelles
> on the other hand with population under 150,000 has multiple tens of IP
> addresses (allocated to Seychelles registered companies) per capita.
>
> Countries that have very low uptake of IP addresses will likely be mostly
> ones where regulators have not opened up the space to grant new ISP
> licences, my example of Eritrea has only one AS number for instance. Whilst
> AfrNIC can hold back some space for countries that forgot to build their
> digital economies…, the regulators in these countries need to be engaged to
> tell them “it’s now or never”.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 13 Oct 2025, at 22:25, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
>
> 
> Ben
>
> There is critical structural challenge in the continents digital landscape
> and you more than anyone knows this very well that we also suffer from
> uneven maturity of Digital Public Infrastructure and Government Networks
> (GovNet), which directly impacts the equitable deployment of essential
> digital services across majority of countries across our continent.
>
> Look we are talking about numbering infrastructure that would support
> services like e-government, digital IDs, and public/private data exchanges,
> while aligning with AFRINIC's exhaustion-phase policies.
>
> We can not shy away from these reality or pretend that there is lack of
> foresight from actors at Afrinic and the community at large.
>
> Its a known fact that many of our African governments lack operational
> GovNets and strategic reservations of IPv4 address space from AFRINIC could
> serve as a targeted incentive to bridge these gaps.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> *.**/noah*
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025, 8:34 pm Ben Roberts - AfriNIC, <
> ben.roberts at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
>> I think The DPI systems are normally run by state owned digital agency
>> entities which are already mostly LIRs having some space. It is not quite
>> as you describe being state owned LIRs that have sovereign owned IPs that
>> are independent of LIRs..
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 13 Oct 2025, at 20:01, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> 54 African States are taking public services online.
>>
>> Digital Public infrastructure (DPI) is nolonger an idea. Its a real
>> thing. DPI is critical. The private sector will tap into that
>> infrastructure. Its here now.
>>
>> Each of the 54 African states need address space indepedent of LIR space
>> in each sovereign state.
>>
>> These are not ideas that actors in the private sector care about or think
>> about.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> *.**/noah*
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025, 5:52 pm Andrew Alston, <aa at alstonnetworks.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there were updated statistics for the amount of space
>>> allocated in the last 3 years.  In addition to this information regarding
>>> exactly how much free space is still available in the IPv4 unallocated pool
>>> (excluding reservations)
>>>
>>> I ask this because depending on the allocation rate - we may wish to
>>> consider revising the soft-landing policy that currently reserves a /12
>>> worth of ipv4 space for "future uses, as yet unforeseen".
>>>
>>> I point out that the soft landing policy was ratified in 2011, and if we
>>> still, after 14 years, have not been able to articulate a clear reason for
>>> such a large reservation, I think it's time we look at most, if not all, of
>>> that /12 back into the main unallocated pool that can be allocated for
>>> African resource holders that actually need it.
>>>
>>> Amongst other reasons, sitting with unallocated, unannounced, reserved
>>> space like this leaves the space vulnerable to hijacking and malicious use
>>> or even potential theft.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RPD mailing list
>>> RPD at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20251014/1dbfa8f5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list