[rpd] Summary of Proposal AFRINIC Number Resources Transfer Policy AFPUB-2020-GEN-006-DRAFT02

Fri Jan 7 21:30:52 UTC 2022

French!

Lol! Ahahahaha mon cher Owen, partisan du Chaos, tu vois le chaos partout.

Cette proposition de politique nous convient mieux que celle qui permettra
à certains membres-ressources de fuir avec les ressources public
africaines. Donc quelque soit ce que tu diras ça ne changera rien au fait
que cette proposition est tout à fait acceptable. Afin de permettre à ceux
qui ont une réelle volonté de recevoir des ressources IPv4 d'autres régions
sans insidence sur les ressources propre d'AFRINIC. De même toi et tes
recrues ne représentez qu'une et une seule partie, votre employeur, vous
n'êtes donc pas aussi représentatif de la communauté toute entière.

======

English version

LOL ! OOOOH OOOH my dear Owen, supporter of Chaos, you see chaos everywhere.

 This policy proposal suits us better than the one that will allow some
resource-members to flee with African public resources.  So whatever you
say will not change the fact that this proposal is perfectly acceptable.
In order to allow those who have a real will to receive IPv4 resources from
other regions without impact on AFRINIC's own resources.  Likewise you and
your recruits represent one and only one party, your employer, so you are
not as representative of the entire community.

--
Arnaud

Le ven. 7 janv. 2022 à 20:34, Owen DeLong via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> a
écrit :

>
>
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 06:23 , Murungi Daniel via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
> Dear Jodi,
>
>
> Your objection would carry weight if the allocation of number resources
> was in similar quantities across all the RIRs.
>
> You use the word ‘fair’, is it fair that the AFRINIC region has only 3% of
> the global number resources?
>
>
> Is it unfair that someone who shows up to a party 4 hours after it started
> can’t get the exact cocktail he wanted?
>
> True, the Internet is global. This would not be the case if the other
> regions lacked number resources to grow the Internet as we now know it
> (Obviously other reasons such as massive infrastructure investment have
> contributed as well).
>
>
> Everyone has lacked IP number resources for many years. In fact, AFRINIC
> has the largest free pool still in existence.
>
> The fact that AFRINIC and the AFRINIC community have engaged in such bad
> stewardship that there remain unused addresses sitting in inventory while
> the rest of the world has run out shows that, if anything, AFRINIC was
> granted more resources than it could properly manage.
>
> Owen
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 4:40 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
>
> That’s my point: When in other RIRs their realize that resources can go
> only RIR->AFRINIC direction and not reversed, do you think they will not
> change the policies to avoid that?
>
> It is simply not fair to have most of the resources going into a single
> direction. Internet is global.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
> El 6/1/22 13:02, "Murungi Daniel" <dmurungi at wia.co.tz> escribió:
>
> Dear Jodi,
>
>
> Only ARIN had reservations, other RIRs are okay with the proposal.
>
> Keep in mind that as late comers, AFRINIC was allocated the least share of
> number resources and other RIRs recognize this as well.
>
> So I see no issue whatsoever with the AFRINIC region being conservative
> with the little they were allocated.
>
> That’s why the working group is happy with this proposal.
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 1:02 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
>
> I must agree with some of the points raised by AK.
>
> It has been said many times: we can’t have a non-reciprocal policy.
>
> We are only creating the path for a war with the other RIRs.
>
> In this region we always complained about other RIRs rules trying to
> interfere with our own rules, and we are now doing exactly the same?
>
> How come can we expect that other RIRs will not change their policies to
> protect their resources, and ensure that their own transfer policies don’t
> work anymore with AFRINIC, unless AFRINIC turns into a reciprocal system?
>
> Clearly it is a very wrong decision and will turn against AFRINIC.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
> El 5/1/22 21:53, "ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE" <oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng>
> escribió:
>
> Dear PDWG,
>  There are a number of issues with this policy that have been raised and I
> am surprised that only a few were mentioned in this summary.
>
> I am also surprised that those who were saying reciprocity was an issue
> with a similar policy are now saying it's no more an issue. I would have
> gone into the archive but I have better things to do.
>
> Those who drafted this summary are now assuming the role of authors. If
> you agree that this policy is not reciprocal but it should be implemented
> with RIRs that it is reciprocal with then can you tell me why other similar
> policies are not reaching consensus on this same basis?. This is a very
> dangerous precedence. now policies can be implemented with a group. what a
> good laugh we are having here.
>
> Please what are we doing differently this time? So editorial changes are
> now allowed by the same set of people who said no changes is allowed a
> month before the PPM according to the CPM.   Funny enough the same person
> raising this same issue is one of those who now drafted this so-called
> summary.
> Which version is the version that you are now claiming is reaching a
> consensus here. Is it the current version before the PPM  or the version
> that the authors have agreed to make editorial changes too.  What are these
> editorial changes?  Can you explain them? *I hope I get a response to
> this.*
>
> I see nothing different happing now from what we did. Our template is
> clearly being used by the same set of people who were shouting then. The
> only difference is that their will is now being implemented.  I knew this
> was a script all along am not in any way surprised. some people now don't
> understand what an RIR is. and suddenly we having RIR lessons.
>
> Let us be clear on this, this policy didn't reach a consensus for the
> simple fact that it is not reciprocal among other reasons.
>
> I know that all opposition to this policy would be ignored became all
> these are just a formality so I won't waste my time too much on this. The
> decisions were made a long time ago and this is just a drama.  Same with
> the appeals it is now the same circle of people typical way of doing
> things, therefore, I can clearly predict the future. Unfortunately, the
> chair of appeals is someone I respect and like so much hence I would never
> comment on anything she has a hand in no matter the temptation I would
> never directly or indirectly disrespect her.
>
> Congratulation to Noah and friends, I was thinking you wait and pass this
> policy at the next ppm but it seems time is running out of time and it has
> to be done now.  Fortunately, I only decided to send this mail because  I
> am not expecting those crazy blackmailing responses from my good friend. He
> now has a court case to answer too and am sure he would finally get to
> learn some lessons or maybe I should also consult on how I can press a
> similar charge.  let me quote from ...."the truth is definitely stronger.
> Always stay on the path of truth :-) "
>
> Let me stop here before I get the puppet card.
>
> AK
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, 16:32 PDWG Chair, <vincent at ngundi.me.ke> wrote:
>
> Dear PDWG,
>
> The  summary of the elements that led to the PDWG Chairs decision for the
> policy  proposal AFRINIC Number Resources Transfer Policy - Policy Proposal
> AFPUB-2020-GEN-006-DRAFT02 that was discussed during the AFRINIC-34 Public
> Policy Meeting is as follows:-
>
> Lack of reciprocity with ARIN was raised and addressed by the authors and
> members of the PDWG, who mentioned that while the proposal is conservative
> and aims at protecting the resource pool of AFRINIC, AFRINIC can start with
> the implementation of resource transfers with those RIRs that have
> confirmed or do not require reciprocity. The authors also clarified that
> incoming transfers of legacy resources will be covered by the AFRINIC RSA
> as the recipient will have to become a member.
>
> After deliberation, the PDWG Co-chairs announced that having considered
> the current version of the policy proposal, the deliberations during the
> current PPM and the editorial changes that the authors have committed to,
> they have determined that rough consensus has been reached. The updated
> version of the policy proposal, with ID AFPUB-2020-GEN-006-DRAFT03, was
> submitted on 22 Nov 2021 and is available at
> https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2020-gen-006-d3 . This version of
> the proposal   will now move to Last Call and the community can further
> engage in that period.
>
> The Last Call starts on 8 December 2021 and will end at 23h59 UTC on 5
> January 2022.
>
> Regards,
> Vincent Ngundi & Darwin Da Costa
> AFRINIC PDWG CO-CHAIRS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/>, Weekly Bulletin
> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal
> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal
> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> HelpDesk
> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/more-resources/e-notices/6845-how-to-resolve-email-portal-login-problems-for-staff-and-students>
>
> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20220107/44f15b12/attachment-0001.html>