[rpd] Abuse addrsses

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Ronald,

The proposal reached consensus and is in the last call, but it is under appeal.

Unfortunately, the chairs are miss-interpreting the PDP and without any further explanation, for more that I've asked for it, and they are "holding" the proposal in the middle of the process, in a clear violation of the PDP. The PDP clearly differentiates the Appeal Committee work from the chairs work, so only the Board can "hold" the proposal if there is an appeal pending.

Once more I take the opportunity to request the chairs for a clear explanation of why and based on what section of the PDP, they are holding a proposal in the last-call.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 17/10/21 2:11, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> escribió:

    Was there a proposal in exiatance at one time to require members to add
    abuse reporting email addresses to their ASN and/or IP block WHOIS records?

    I seem to vaguely recall that there may have been one, but I'm not sure
    anymore.

    If there was one, whatever happened to that?


    Regards,
    rfg


    P.S.  I am a bit annoyed right at the moment, because I just got a spam from
    196.81.68.81 which belongs to Maroc Telecom, and they don't have any abuse
    reporting address in the WHOIS data base.

    This company holds 8,404,992 AFRINIC-issued IPv4 addresses, so it is not
    exactly small.  The fact that all of that IPv4 space has been allocated
    to the company, by AFRINIC, but with absolutely NO abuse reporting contact
    is, well, crazy.


    P.P.S.  Based on the nature of the spam, I can say with nearly 100% certainty
    that the machine at 196.81.68.81 has been security compromised.

    _______________________________________________
    RPD mailing list
    RPD at afrinic.net
    https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.