Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Policy Proposal: in-region vs out-of-region use of resources, and restrictions thereon
Sami Ait Ali Oulahcen
sami at marwan.ma
Wed Jul 28 14:33:16 UTC 2021
On 7/28/21 1:41 PM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi Jaco,
>
> I believe that it's plain that AFRINIC was established for the benefit
> of the African continent, this is even enshrined in the by-laws, as
> detailed in section 3.4. I believe sub-point (i) summarises it quite well:
>
> /(i)to provide the service of allocating and registering Internet
> resources for the purposes of enabling communications via open system
> network protocols and to assist in the development and growth of the
> Internet in the //*African*//region; [emphasis added]/
>
>
> I won't quote the rest of it here, but the rest of the section is
> equally relevant (https://afrinic.net/bylaws#b20-3) and makes it plain
> that everything AFRINIC does should be for the benefit of the African
> continent (region). Even the *membership* is based on this regional
> affinity:
>
> /MEMBERSHIP - 6.1//
> //Membership shall be open to://
> //(i) any Person [including non-natural persons eg companies] who is
> *geographically based within*, and *providing services in the African
> region*, and who is engaged in the use of, or business of providing,
> open system protocol network services;/
>
> That is - the member is based in the AFRINIC region. This applies to
> all three classes of members (Registered, Resource and Associate).
>
> It is also implied here that the resources are for use within the
> African continent.
>
> Over the last while it's become apparent that many people are extremely
> unhappy about the fact that Afrinic resources are being used
> off-continent. Based on the above I think it's a fair
> assumption/expectation (as well as appropriate) that at least the
> majority of issued resources should be used in-region (In particular
> IPv4 resources).
>
> I believe it to be appropriate at this time to state this as policy in
> the CPM, and thereby to make the general sentiment I've seen plain as
> day. This should then apply to all issued resources retrospectively as
> well. Not only newly issued resources (which is currently already dealt
> with from the soft landing policy).
>
Nice initiative !
> I request from the community opinions on the following:
>
> 1. If you had to assign a percentage to out-of-region use, what
> percentage of resources allocated from AFRINIC would be considered "fair
> usage" for out of region use (I'm thinking "At least 50% of issued
> resources should be used in-region", or then "less than 50% of resources
> may be used out-of-region"); and
>
I'd say 80%/20% for anything above a /16, 20% out-of-region is plenty to
support connectivity back to Africa.
> 2. Assuming that a policy gets passed to enforce some form of in-region
> use - what would be an acceptable amount of time to provide members to
> comply (I'm thinking either 6 or 12 months, definitely no longer than 18
> unless someone can justify that sensibly) with respect to existing
> resources?
I think it could take more, but that's just me.
>
> You're welcome to differentiate between different types of resources
> (for example, I don't think it makes sense to have to get a separate AS
> number just because a company is multi-continent, so here as long as the
> AS is also used in-region). Space on v6 is of such a nature that I'm
> inclined to say "who cares".
Agreed on both.
>
> Currently the only restriction in the CPM regarding resource usage
> relates to IPv4 during soft-landing
> (https://afrinic.net/policy/manual#Soft-Landing relating specifically to
> the last /8. The fact that this can just be used in-region and then
> move other existing resources out-of-region is of concern to me and this
> is part of the "problem" I'd like to address in a policy update.
>
Good luck.
Cheers !
Sami
> Kind Regards,
> Jaco Kroon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
More information about the RPD
mailing list