[rpd] question for co-chairs regarding their slides

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Awesome about the slides for today and tks again for the session today.

To make it clear, my point about the future meetings, and thinking twice, it could be a good idea to share the "concerns" on each policy proposal even "in-between" PPMs, maybe every quarter or so, or when you see that a give policy proposal has no anymore a "live" discussion in the list, etc. This can help authors to 1) respond to specific concerns that may have been missed along the discussion, 2) work in a new version if required, and for the community to see if there are other points not raised before.

I think this exercise is also very good as a matter of *transparency* about your consensus decisions and may help to avoid a lot of extra work in long and repeated endless discussions in the list, appeals, etc. 

(for example: I totally missed your concern on the abuse-c proposal "redundancy" for about 2 years, even for me was obvious, but some other community folks may had thought differently)

Having that together with impact analysis few weeks after each proposal version, will be a dream for all of us!

Tks a lot!


Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 2/6/21 15:12, "PDWG Chair" <vincent at ngundi.me.ke> escribió:

    Dear Jordi,

    Thank you for your feedback which we have taken note of.

    The slides will be shared today.

    Going forward, the same will be published/shared beforehand.

    Regards,
    Vincent Ngundi & Darwin Da Costa
    AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chairs

    On 02/06/2021 15:44, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > I'm very happy with the slides that the co-chairs prepared for the different policy proposals, and specially about the "concerns" and if they have been addressed or not in the previous discussion. I think it is extremely useful for all.
    >
    > However, it will be much better, for both authors and community, if they are posted in the RPD list a few days before the PPM.
    >
    > I tried to find those slides in the agenda and aren't there. Can you provide them?
    >
    > In fact, I will like to have the ones for the tomorrow's policy proposals, so the authors can work already in a clear response if any concern has not been addressed. Providing answers "on the fly" may create inaccuracy of errors that we shall try to avoid as much as possible, and doesn't allow us to look for external references, etc.
    >
    > Tks!
    >
    >   
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    > @jordipalet
    >   
    >   
    >
    >
    >
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.theipv6company.com
    > The IPv6 Company
    >
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > RPD mailing list
    > RPD at afrinic.net
    > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.