[rpd] APPEAL AGAINST THE CONFIRMATION OF CONSENSUS DECLARED BY THE POLICY LIAISON TEAM AND THE BOARD ON THE SELECTION OF PDWG CO-CHAIRS

[Arnaud AMELINA]

French version bellow

Good observation Ish, I have the impression that some are on a mission to
block the PDP, and that the Board is not helping the situation by evading
its responsibilities.  It is time for the Board to realize that the system
is blocked and that it needs to be unblocked.

The recent complaints about the AC’s practices and decisions and the
resignation of 2 of the 3 community elected members, represente serious
matters which the board should have addressed prompted and efficiently.

 I invite the new Co-chairs to continue their work, animation and
management of the PDP.

===

Bonne observation Ish, j'ai comme l'impression certains sont en mission
pour bloquer le PDP, et que le Board n'aide pas à résoudre les problèmes en
fuyant ses responsabilités. Il est temps que le Board se rende compte que
le système est bloqué et qu'il faille le débloquer.

Les récentes plaintes concernant les pratiques et décisions du CA et la
démission de 2 des 3 membres élus de la communauté, représentent des
questions graves que le conseil aurait dû traiter avec promptitude et
efficacité.

J'invite aussi les nouveaux Co-chairs à continuer leur travail, d'animation
et de gestion de notre PDP.

--
Arnaud

Le ven. 7 mai 2021 à 15:07, Ish Sookun <ish at lsl.digital> a écrit :


> Hi Lucilla,

>

> On 22/04/2021 06:36, lucilla fornaro wrote:

> > As we can all see, it is true that the CPM (3.5) openly mentions the

> > appeal against the co-chairs, but it doesn’t forbid other forms of

> > appeals. Furthermore, the appeal reports a serious matter that should be

> > properly investigated. This is the only way to go through it.

> >

>

> The definition [1] of the Appeal Committee on the AFRINIC site states:

>

>     « The AFRINIC Policy Development Appeal Committee, or the Appeal

>       Committee, is a committee appointed by the AFRINIC Board, intended

>       to adjudicate on appeals in terms of the Conflict Resolution

>       section of the AFRINIC Policy Development Process (PDP). Any such

>       appeal will involve a disagreement regarding the actions taken by

>       the Chair(s) of the Policy Development Working Group (PDWG). »

>

> It is clearly stated that an appeal should involve a disagreement

> regarding the actions taken by the Chair(s) of the PDWG.

>

> >

> > In particular, I believe that the declaration of the consensus by the

> > Board of Directors goes beyond their authority.

> >

>

>

> You believe that the declaration of the consensus by the BoD goes beyond

> their authority, because this is not specified in the CPM, right? But

> then, it is also not specified in the CPM that the Appeal Committee

> should listen to appeals against the BoD. Yet, you mentioned in your

> email that since the CPM does not forbid such appeals, meaning since it

> is not written, you find it the only way to go through it.

>

> I am trying to reconcile two contradictory statements. On one side, you

> say the BoD can't declare the consensus because it is not specified so

> in the CPM. However, you also admit that it is not written in the CPM

> for the Appeal Committee to listen to appeals against the BoD but you

> are okay with it.

>

> What makes you be okay with one but not the other?

>

> Regards,

>

> Ish Sookun

>

> [1] https://afrinic.net/policy/appeal-committee

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210508/cac6a2e9/attachment.html>