Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM |

Tue Apr 6 10:18:08 UTC 2021


I understand that, however, I can’t trust it, very unfortunately.

The chairs said they sent it. AK told it also to me in private email, and having seen the last actions from the board, I’ve more reasons to trust AK than AFRINIC.

Either AK is right or is not. If AK is right, he should demonstrate it, very simple. There is nothing secret in emails exchanged with the staff or board. We know other chairs always copied the list; nothing should be different this time.

If AK can’t demonstrate it, then how we can trust him as a co-chair? Believe me, I will prefer to have the emails demonstrating who is not telling the complete true here.




El 5/4/21 18:38, "AFRINIC Policy Liaison" <policy-liaison at> escribió:

Dear Jordi,

This question has been raised for quite some time and our team has checked and double-checked even in the logs and found no evidence. However, if the date and time as well as other details about the emails are shared, the technical team will check again and clear this situation.


Policy Liaison Team

On 05/04/2021 12:50 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
However, one thing that worries me is if we should trust our previous co-chair or the board and I'm referring here to the fact that AK has told the community that the policies that reached consensus were sent to the board for ratification and the board and the CEO denied that. All the communication from the co-chairs and the board regarding that has never been disclosed, without any explanation about that, even if should have been done copy to the list, for a pure transparency reason.

So, please, AK, if you really think that you did right and you can do a new term without those errors and, consequently, we can trust you, this is your perfect opportunity to clarify all that by copying all those emails to the list.
AFRINIC Policy Liaison.
t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | | |
_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at

IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list