[rpd] Selecting WG Co-Chairs: Was Re: Can a Consensual Decision of the PDWG Violate the PDP? (was: Report from Recall Committee)

[Sunday Folayan]

In the light of MJE's contribution, I would like to modify my earlier 
submission.


My personal preference for Interim Chairs' selection:

• [A] a selection through rough consensus [2] After prospects do volunteer;
• [B] a selection based on ranking voting [3] if more than 2 volunteers, 
then discussions;
• [C] a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1] if more 
than 2 candidates and discussions stalemate;
• [D] a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4] (a 
long and unnecessary process for selecting the interim Chairs);
• [E] any other possibility?

I have no problem with NOMCOM being the selectees in [D] above. It will 
not be a long and un-necessary process.

Sunday.


On 2/19/21 9:58 AM, Mark Elkins wrote:
>
> Ask the NomCom to ask for volunteers. Just use the templates from 
> 2020. Have an initial cut-off after seven days.
>
> With last year, I was quite ecstatic when we ended up with just one 
> volunteer. "Consensus" as such is great.
>
> However, we technically need one person for three to six months and 
> another for that same period plus one year. I'm wondering whether it 
> might be more sane to extend both of these positions by one year? - or 
> we simply consent to have the same people extended by an additional 
> year each at whenever we have the next AFRINIC meeting?  Alternativly 
> - we could be seen as simply bringing forwards the normal election of 
> Co-Chairs to now(ish) - as we have an urgent need.
>
> We also need to have a system on deciding who is in for a short term 
> and who is in for a longer term. Voting may be the simplest method (as 
> this will all be done remotely).
>
> Any way - my thoughts.
>
> On 2/19/21 9:55 AM, Sunday Folayan wrote:
>> Hello Sylvain
>>
>> On 2/18/21 11:48 PM, Sylvain Baya wrote:
>>> ~°~
>>> • a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1];
>>> • a selection through rough consensus [2];
>>> • a selection based on ranking voting [3];
>>> • a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4];
>>> • any other possibility?
>>> ~°~
>>>
>>
>> My personal preference for Interim Chairs' selection:
>>
>> • a selection through rough consensus [2] After prospects do volunteer;
>> • a selection based on ranking voting [3] if more than 2 volunteers, 
>> then discussions;
>> • a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1] if more than 
>> 2 candidates and discussions stalemate;
>> • a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4] (a 
>> long and unnecessary process for selecting the interim Chairs);
>> • any other possibility?
>>
>>
>> Sunday.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> -- 
>
> Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africa
> mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.826010496 <tel:+27826010496>
> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
>
> Posix SystemsVCARD for MJ Elkins
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/115c751f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: abessive_logo.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/115c751f/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: QR-MJElkins.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/115c751f/attachment.png>