[rpd] Selecting WG Co-Chairs: Was Re: Can a Consensual Decision of the PDWG Violate the PDP? (was: Report from Recall Committee)

[Sunday Folayan]

In the light of MJE's contribution, I would like to modify my earlier 
submission.


My personal preference for Interim Chairs' selection:

• [A] a selection through rough consensus [2] After prospects do volunteer;
• [B] a selection based on ranking voting [3] if more than 2 volunteers, 
then discussions;
• [C] a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1] if more 
than 2 candidates and discussions stalemate;
• [D] a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4] (a 
long and unnecessary process for selecting the interim Chairs);
• [E] any other possibility?

I have no problem with NOMCOM being the selectees in [D] above. It will 
not be a long and un-necessary process.

Sunday.


On 2/19/21 9:58 AM, Mark Elkins wrote:

>

> Ask the NomCom to ask for volunteers. Just use the templates from 

> 2020. Have an initial cut-off after seven days.

>

> With last year, I was quite ecstatic when we ended up with just one 

> volunteer. "Consensus" as such is great.

>

> However, we technically need one person for three to six months and 

> another for that same period plus one year. I'm wondering whether it 

> might be more sane to extend both of these positions by one year? - or 

> we simply consent to have the same people extended by an additional 

> year each at whenever we have the next AFRINIC meeting?  Alternativly 

> - we could be seen as simply bringing forwards the normal election of 

> Co-Chairs to now(ish) - as we have an urgent need.

>

> We also need to have a system on deciding who is in for a short term 

> and who is in for a longer term. Voting may be the simplest method (as 

> this will all be done remotely).

>

> Any way - my thoughts.

>

> On 2/19/21 9:55 AM, Sunday Folayan wrote:

>> Hello Sylvain

>>

>> On 2/18/21 11:48 PM, Sylvain Baya wrote:

>>> ~°~

>>> • a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1];

>>> • a selection through rough consensus [2];

>>> • a selection based on ranking voting [3];

>>> • a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4];

>>> • any other possibility?

>>> ~°~

>>>

>>

>> My personal preference for Interim Chairs' selection:

>>

>> • a selection through rough consensus [2] After prospects do volunteer;

>> • a selection based on ranking voting [3] if more than 2 volunteers, 

>> then discussions;

>> • a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1] if more than 

>> 2 candidates and discussions stalemate;

>> • a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4] (a 

>> long and unnecessary process for selecting the interim Chairs);

>> • any other possibility?

>>

>>

>> Sunday.

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> -- 

>

> Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africa

> mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.826010496 <tel:+27826010496>

> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za

>

> Posix SystemsVCARD for MJ Elkins

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/115c751f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: abessive_logo.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/115c751f/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: QR-MJElkins.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/115c751f/attachment-0001.png>