[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs

[Mark Elkins]

On 2/19/21 9:47 AM, Sunday Folayan wrote:

>

> I am OK with Noah's trajectory, proposition, and Mike's modification.

>

> Slight edit in 4. "which is am AFRINIC resource members" should read 

> "who is an AFRINIC resource member"

>

> I also think we should add ...

>

> 6. Ability to remain calm in the face of provocation and respect for 

> the continental diversity.

>

Haha! Fair enough!



> Sunday.

>

> On 2/19/21 7:38 AM, Mike Silber wrote:

>> Thanks Noah

>>

>> I think that is an excellent list.

>>

>> The only thing I would add to your point 5 is an intangible quality - 

>> a history (or perception) of building consensus. Some of us 

>> understand RFC 7282, but because of our passion, style or language 

>> are less successful (or perceived as less successful) at moving the 

>> group towards consensus.

>>

>> Regards

>>

>> Mike

>>

>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 07:54, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz 

>> <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:

>>

>>     Hi PDWG participants,

>>

>>     Could we as a WG participants agree on a set of criteria for a WG

>>     participant to become a co-chair.

>>

>>     This I believe is more important and I had shared some few ideas

>>     below a separate thread but I think it would make sense to work

>>     this out on this new thread.

>>

>>     Some thoughts that crossed my mind as criteria;

>>

>>     1. Active participation in WG discussions by a participant, in

>>     say, the past 3 years.

>>

>>     2. Participant should demonstrate a clear understanding of the

>>     CPM and especially sections that relate to the PDWG.

>>

>>     3. Participant should have some 5 years sound technical

>>     experience in this space with a clear understanding of Internet

>>     Protocol and preferably having worked in this space.

>>

>>     4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource

>>     members could come in handy for a participant interested in

>>     chairing policy discussions.

>>

>>     5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and

>>     consensus is all about, after all consensus is a path and not a

>>     destination. This is very important.

>>

>>     Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what

>>     criteria are more required and which ones to discard to keep it

>>     simple.

>>

>>     I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation

>>     to first sort this requirements out before we can think of the

>>     selection of the interim co-chairs.

>>

>>     Cheers

>>     Noah

>>     _______________________________________________

>>     RPD mailing list

>>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>     <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-- 

Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africa
mje at posix.co.za       Tel: +27.826010496 <tel:+27826010496>
For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za 
<https://ftth.posix.co.za>

Posix SystemsVCARD for MJ Elkins

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/d0e325f7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: abessive_logo.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/d0e325f7/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: QR-MJElkins.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/d0e325f7/attachment.png>