[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs

[Mark Elkins]

On 2/19/21 9:47 AM, Sunday Folayan wrote:
>
> I am OK with Noah's trajectory, proposition, and Mike's modification.
>
> Slight edit in 4. "which is am AFRINIC resource members" should read 
> "who is an AFRINIC resource member"
>
> I also think we should add ...
>
> 6. Ability to remain calm in the face of provocation and respect for 
> the continental diversity.
>
Haha! Fair enough!


> Sunday.
>
> On 2/19/21 7:38 AM, Mike Silber wrote:
>> Thanks Noah
>>
>> I think that is an excellent list.
>>
>> The only thing I would add to your point 5 is an intangible quality - 
>> a history (or perception) of building consensus. Some of us 
>> understand RFC 7282, but because of our passion, style or language 
>> are less successful (or perceived as less successful) at moving the 
>> group towards consensus.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 07:54, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz 
>> <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi PDWG participants,
>>
>>     Could we as a WG participants agree on a set of criteria for a WG
>>     participant to become a co-chair.
>>
>>     This I believe is more important and I had shared some few ideas
>>     below a separate thread but I think it would make sense to work
>>     this out on this new thread.
>>
>>     Some thoughts that crossed my mind as criteria;
>>
>>     1. Active participation in WG discussions by a participant, in
>>     say, the past 3 years.
>>
>>     2. Participant should demonstrate a clear understanding of the
>>     CPM and especially sections that relate to the PDWG.
>>
>>     3. Participant should have some 5 years sound technical
>>     experience in this space with a clear understanding of Internet
>>     Protocol and preferably having worked in this space.
>>
>>     4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource
>>     members could come in handy for a participant interested in
>>     chairing policy discussions.
>>
>>     5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and
>>     consensus is all about, after all consensus is a path and not a
>>     destination. This is very important.
>>
>>     Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what
>>     criteria are more required and which ones to discard to keep it
>>     simple.
>>
>>     I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation
>>     to first sort this requirements out before we can think of the
>>     selection of the interim co-chairs.
>>
>>     Cheers
>>     Noah
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     RPD mailing list
>>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>     <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-- 

Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africa
mje at posix.co.za       Tel: +27.826010496 <tel:+27826010496>
For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za 
<https://ftth.posix.co.za>

Posix SystemsVCARD for MJ Elkins

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/d0e325f7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: abessive_logo.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/d0e325f7/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: QR-MJElkins.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/d0e325f7/attachment.png>