Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON: Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Thu Feb 11 12:19:29 UTC 2021





> On Feb 11, 2021, at 02:16 , Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:

>

> I'll go with what Mike has said, that is - Option 1. I think a directive from the CEO & Chair is all that is needed and doesn't really need to wait a week for a full Board Meeting. It is on the shoulders of this community to fix the problem.

>

> I think we should only allow the same people that were eligible to vote last time - which would save time. I presume that list still exists.

>

> I'd like to see at least four people standing. I don't believe that the two ex-chairs should be allowed to stand (we are trying to change a bad situation). Personally, I'd like to see people standing that are resource owners - as they then have their own skin in the game - as such. No one with a policy in the current process chain should stand.

>


I don’t think that they should be precluded from standing. While the recall was successful and I think that they are unlikely to receive a plurality of votes as a result, if the community votes to put them back into office, I see no reason that the community should be deprived of that option.

> Most votes - person stands for remainder of two years,

> second most votes - stands for remainder of this current year.

>

> As Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com> said on 24th Dec:

>

> > Is it normal that out of 2 cochairs, none is contact of a resource member?

> > Having a cochair who runs network and serves as contact (technical) of a resource member is a big wish as previously discussed in this community.

>


I don’t think it would be unreasonable to add this as an eligibility requirement through modification of the relevant PDP sections, but I don’t think we should be making it up on the fly without community discussion. There is a process for amending the eligibility requirements and we should follow it if we wish to do so.

Owen


> !

>

>

> On 2/11/21 11:45 AM, Mike Silber wrote:

>> Jaco +1

>>

>> Really humbling that a WG member from outside our region is the one trying to drive to consensus.

>>

>> Some comments inline.

>>

>> Mike

>>

>>> On 11 Feb 2021, at 11:28, Jaco Kroon <jaco at uls.co.za <mailto:jaco at uls.co.za>> wrote:

>>>

>>> Hi Jordi,

>>>

>>> Thank you for your drive on this.

>>>

>>> On 2021/02/11 10:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:

>>>> Hi all,

>>>>

>>>> Following the previous email, we have 4 choices for selecting the new co-chairs:

>>>>

>>>> 1. Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census).

>>>>

>>

>> Agree with 1.

>>>

>>> Pros for (1) / Cons against (2):

>>> - quicker turn around for (1)

>>> - we don't know when feasible we would be able to arrange for (2)

>>>

>>> Cons against (1) / Pros for (2)

>>> - Easier to generate bogus votes for (1).

>>>

>> Agreed

>>>

>>>>

>>>> 3. Ask the board to choose 2 transition co-chairs, so we can have elections in the future (option 2 above).

>>>> 4. Nominate ourselves a few names for transition co-chairs and let the board to decide among them, once they confirm their willingness to take the job, so we can have elections in the future (option 2 above).

>>>

>>>

>>> Personally I don't really think that (3) and (4) are two distinct

>>> options, more like we should try to get recommendations / nominees to

>>> the board as per 4, and then give the board prerogative to select the

>>> candidates (even from non-nominees if none of the nominees have the

>>> required background / skills / suitability, obviously with motivations).

>>>

>> Agreed. I like the option of 4 + 3 if we can get some rough consensus on this list of some nominees. Particularly if (1) takes some time.

>>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

> --

> Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa

> mje at posix.co.za <mailto:mje at posix.co.za> Tel: +27.826010496 <tel:+27826010496>

> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za <https://ftth.posix.co.za/>

>

> <abessive_logo.jpg><QR-MJElkins.png>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210211/5944c613/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list