Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Statement from Legal Counsel

Daniel Yakmut yakmutd at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 14 10:19:07 UTC 2020


Dear Arnaud,

Please are these insinuations for real. How could Co-Chairs recommend
draft policies for board approval.

1. Are we saying that AfriNIC Staff and Board are oblivious what is
happening in the RPD that they cannot detect a rogue policy.

2. Some members are literally becoming paranoid.

3. Why are some community members bent in giving a dog a bad name, so
that it can be hanged.

4. I hope the discerning community members can see through shenanigan
being thrown around.

I will say what a mess!!!

Simply

Daniel

On 13/12/2020 11:35 am, Arnaud AMELINA wrote:

> Hello, PDWG members

>

> It appears in recent communications from legal counsel that co-chairs

> have recommended some draft policies for approval by board.

>

> Why are the recommendations, including the reports prescribed by

> section 3.4.4, not published on this rpd for the sake of transparency

> and the  practices in the matter?

>

> Where did the resource transfer proposal version 5.0 come from?

>

> We seem to have abandoned the PDP and its key underlining principles.

>

> Regards

>

> --

> Arnaud

>

> Le mer. 9 déc. 2020 à 16:25, Ashok <ashok at afrinic.net

> <mailto:ashok at afrinic.net>> a écrit :

>

> *Dear Community members,*

>

> *I refer to AFRINIC’s Chief Executive Officer’s emails dated 30

> November 2020 and 03 December 2020 sent to the PDWG’s Co-Chairs to

> which I was in copy thereof. Copies of the said emails are also

> herewith attached.*

>

> *As AFRINIC’s Legal Counsel I wish first to draw your attention to

> the PDWG’s Co-Chairs’ declaration of consensus dated 07 October

> 2020 in respect of the policy entitled /'Board's Prerogatives'/ –

> AFPUB-2020-GEN-004-DRAFT02- as well as the policy entitled

> /'Resource Transfer Policy'/ –AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04- whereby

> in the latter case, consensus was initially declared on 07 October

> 2020 and which was subsequently reversed by the Co-Chairs on 17

> October 2020.*

>

> *I hold no mandate to interfere in the work of the PDWG and/or its

> independence I shall refrain from doing so.*

>

> *Nevertheless, I deem it my duty to tender my advice, for whatever

> it is worth and without in any way pressurising, the PDWG, an

> AFRINIC-related body to be bound by same.*

>

> *My advice addresses the aforementioned two policy proposals and

> my purpose is to ensure that the work of the PDWG thereon as well

> as its outcome are both legally in order. I have given anxious

> consideration to this matter and also bear in mind that where the

> acts and doings of the PDWG are not legally in order, same may

> have a detrimental effect on the image and reputation of AFRINIC

> both as a corporate body and responsible RIR. *

>

> *In regard to the policy entitled /'Board's Prerogatives'/, I have

> taken note of AFRINIC's Staff Assessment report dated 04 November

> 2020 -

> **https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2020-gen-004-d2#impact

> <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2020-gen-004-d2#impact>**. *

>

> *You may have noticed that the said report has raised both serious

> governance and operational issues as well as areas of uncertainty

> observed in the proposed policy which has, up to now, remained

> unaddressed. *

>

> *Consequently, it is my humble view that the PDWG may in its

> wisdom consider to review its own stand in respect of these policy

> proposals so as to avoid any form of encroachment, potential or

> otherwise, onto the Board of Director’s prerogatives, the

> foundations of which are grounded in articles 3.4 and 15 of the

> AFRINIC’s bylaws. *

>

> *However, should the PDWG maintain its stand in respect of the

> above, then the appropriate motion has to be made during an AGMM,

> pursuant to Article 7.7 of the bylaws to amend articles 3.4,

> 15(1), 15(2) and 15(3) of the bylaws thus allowing the powers of

> the Board of Directors to be subjected to the directives and

> guidance of the PDWG.*

>

> *As regard the policy entitled /'Resource Transfer Policy'/, the

> PDWG may be aware that the said policy (i.e. version 4 thereof) is

> presentlythe subject of an appeal before the Appeal Committee and

> the matter is yet to be determined. *

>

> *Consequently, the PDWG is hereby informed and advised that it is

> a matter of sound and settled legal principle that, pending the

> outcome of the Appeal Committee proceedings, it (PDWG) refrains

> from entertaining any request emanating from the relevant

> co-authors of the said policy proposals for further amending these

> proposals on the legal principle of /pendente lite/. It is also my

> considered view that any attempt in the meantime by the latter to

> submit a newly purported version of their policy proposal will be

> inadmissible (non-receivable) in law. *

>

> *To close my submission may I urge the PDWG to give due weight to

> my non-binding legal advice and consequently appreciate the real

> risk of AFRINIC, in the event that the Appeal proceedings are

> ignored, having to ratify and implement two policy proposals, on

> the same subject matter, which would lead to an unprecedented

> conflictual situation. *

>

> *Ashok.B.Radhakissoon.*

>

> *Legal Counsel

> *

>

> **

>

> *

>

> *

>

> **

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201214/f2b92e9b/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list