Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Statement from Legal Counsel
Daniel Yakmut
yakmutd at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 14 10:19:07 UTC 2020
Dear Arnaud,
Please are these insinuations for real. How could Co-Chairs recommend
draft policies for board approval.
1. Are we saying that AfriNIC Staff and Board are oblivious what is
happening in the RPD that they cannot detect a rogue policy.
2. Some members are literally becoming paranoid.
3. Why are some community members bent in giving a dog a bad name, so
that it can be hanged.
4. I hope the discerning community members can see through shenanigan
being thrown around.
I will say what a mess!!!
Simply
Daniel
On 13/12/2020 11:35 am, Arnaud AMELINA wrote:
> Hello, PDWG members
>
> It appears in recent communications from legal counsel that co-chairs
> have recommended some draft policies for approval by board.
>
> Why are the recommendations, including the reports prescribed by
> section 3.4.4, not published on this rpd for the sake of transparency
> and the practices in the matter?
>
> Where did the resource transfer proposal version 5.0 come from?
>
> We seem to have abandoned the PDP and its key underlining principles.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Arnaud
>
> Le mer. 9 déc. 2020 à 16:25, Ashok <ashok at afrinic.net
> <mailto:ashok at afrinic.net>> a écrit :
>
> *Dear Community members,*
>
> *I refer to AFRINIC’s Chief Executive Officer’s emails dated 30
> November 2020 and 03 December 2020 sent to the PDWG’s Co-Chairs to
> which I was in copy thereof. Copies of the said emails are also
> herewith attached.*
>
> *As AFRINIC’s Legal Counsel I wish first to draw your attention to
> the PDWG’s Co-Chairs’ declaration of consensus dated 07 October
> 2020 in respect of the policy entitled /'Board's Prerogatives'/ –
> AFPUB-2020-GEN-004-DRAFT02- as well as the policy entitled
> /'Resource Transfer Policy'/ –AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04- whereby
> in the latter case, consensus was initially declared on 07 October
> 2020 and which was subsequently reversed by the Co-Chairs on 17
> October 2020.*
>
> *I hold no mandate to interfere in the work of the PDWG and/or its
> independence I shall refrain from doing so.*
>
> *Nevertheless, I deem it my duty to tender my advice, for whatever
> it is worth and without in any way pressurising, the PDWG, an
> AFRINIC-related body to be bound by same.*
>
> *My advice addresses the aforementioned two policy proposals and
> my purpose is to ensure that the work of the PDWG thereon as well
> as its outcome are both legally in order. I have given anxious
> consideration to this matter and also bear in mind that where the
> acts and doings of the PDWG are not legally in order, same may
> have a detrimental effect on the image and reputation of AFRINIC
> both as a corporate body and responsible RIR. *
>
> *In regard to the policy entitled /'Board's Prerogatives'/, I have
> taken note of AFRINIC's Staff Assessment report dated 04 November
> 2020 -
> **https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2020-gen-004-d2#impact
> <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2020-gen-004-d2#impact>**. *
>
> *You may have noticed that the said report has raised both serious
> governance and operational issues as well as areas of uncertainty
> observed in the proposed policy which has, up to now, remained
> unaddressed. *
>
> *Consequently, it is my humble view that the PDWG may in its
> wisdom consider to review its own stand in respect of these policy
> proposals so as to avoid any form of encroachment, potential or
> otherwise, onto the Board of Director’s prerogatives, the
> foundations of which are grounded in articles 3.4 and 15 of the
> AFRINIC’s bylaws. *
>
> *However, should the PDWG maintain its stand in respect of the
> above, then the appropriate motion has to be made during an AGMM,
> pursuant to Article 7.7 of the bylaws to amend articles 3.4,
> 15(1), 15(2) and 15(3) of the bylaws thus allowing the powers of
> the Board of Directors to be subjected to the directives and
> guidance of the PDWG.*
>
> *As regard the policy entitled /'Resource Transfer Policy'/, the
> PDWG may be aware that the said policy (i.e. version 4 thereof) is
> presentlythe subject of an appeal before the Appeal Committee and
> the matter is yet to be determined. *
>
> *Consequently, the PDWG is hereby informed and advised that it is
> a matter of sound and settled legal principle that, pending the
> outcome of the Appeal Committee proceedings, it (PDWG) refrains
> from entertaining any request emanating from the relevant
> co-authors of the said policy proposals for further amending these
> proposals on the legal principle of /pendente lite/. It is also my
> considered view that any attempt in the meantime by the latter to
> submit a newly purported version of their policy proposal will be
> inadmissible (non-receivable) in law. *
>
> *To close my submission may I urge the PDWG to give due weight to
> my non-binding legal advice and consequently appreciate the real
> risk of AFRINIC, in the event that the Appeal proceedings are
> ignored, having to ratify and implement two policy proposals, on
> the same subject matter, which would lead to an unprecedented
> conflictual situation. *
>
> *Ashok.B.Radhakissoon.*
>
> *Legal Counsel
> *
>
> **
>
> *
>
> *
>
> **
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201214/f2b92e9b/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list