[rpd] End of Last call

[Ekaterina Kalugina]

Dear all,

The objections to this policy were not major objections. Therefore, the
chairs performed the administrative function within the scope of the CPM.

In addition, none of us are 'fans' of the proposed policy. It's just some
of our colleges including myself see a great value and need in passing this
policy as soon as possible.

Let us not try to downplay the danger of the situation. Stability of the
region must be preserved. Not having an inter RIR policy on time could be
detrimental. Especially in these unprecedented times we must take every
step.

The CPM is there to ensure the best future for the region. This should be
our main focus. And it seems to me that between all these squabbles and
passive aggressive statements many of you lost sight of what is actually
important here.

In my view, it's important to create a safe net instead of raging over
minor technicalities of the PDP.

I think it makes more sense to advocate for preventative care rather than
suffer the consequences of the terribly uncertain future. Wouldn't you
agree?

Best,

Ekaterina

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, 19:11 Gregoire EHOUMI via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> I agree with Jordi on this.

>

> This is a total mess between the policy proposal versions and the

> discussions.

>

> I can see that the co-chairs did not take into account outstanding

> objections.

>

> Therefore, I urge co-chairs to reconsider this decision.

>

> --

> Gregoire

>

> On Oct. 8, 2020 3:42 a.m., JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>

> wrote:

>

> Hi Moses, all,

>

>

>

> I feel that there is a fundamental mistake here and I beg you to

> reconsider it.

>

>

>

> You've not waited for the staff confirmation about the reciprocity of the

> Inter-RIR transfers. What happens if now the staff comes back and confirms

> that we can’t decide in our policy what do to in other regions, so there is

> no reciprocity and so, we can’t implement this policy?

>

>

>

> Accordingly, I strongly suggest that you change your mind, following

> section 3.5 of the PDP: “A person who disagrees with the actions taken by

> the Chair(s) shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the

> PDWG”.

>

>

>

> The reasons for this are:

>

>    1. The only valid proposal version is the one that is published at the

>    web site and then announced to the list. The authors did changes several

>    times, that aren’t there. As we are discussing version 2, we should have a

>    version 2.x to show those.

>    2. The staff must confirm the reciprocity of the last 2.x version in

>    the list. As indicated in 3.4.3, you can extend the last-call to ensure

>    that this is matched.

>    3. This and other aspects, have been indicated several times by myself

>    and others during the last-call. Those are valid-objections that remain

>    unresolved and if you extend the last-call and agree with the latest

>    changes from the authors, then could make sense, otherwise, it is

>    impossible that you can declare the last-call and still “consensus”.

>

>

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Jordi

>

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> El 8/10/20 1:37, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com> escribió:

>

>

>

> Hello PDWG members,

>

>

>

> Following the last online PPM held on 16th-17th September 2020. Last call

> was announced on 21st September 2020 for the following policy proposals.

>

> ·         Board Prerogatives on the PDP

>

> ·         Resource Transfer Policy

>

> This is to further announce that the  last call period for the above

> proposals has ended, based on feedback received from the community and the

> editorial changes made by authors to address community concerns, the

> consensus decision from AFRINIC32 is still maintained.

>

> Co-Chairs will now send a report to the Board recommending ratification of

> the two above proposals in line with CPM 3.0.

>

> Regards,

>

> Co-Chairs

>

> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201008/8847666b/attachment-0001.html>