Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] End of Last call

ALAIN AINA aalain at trstech.net
Thu Oct 8 12:31:49 UTC 2020


Hello All,

We doing all of these in the last-call ? Nobody knows which version of the document is being reviewed.
Amazing!

—Alain



> On 8 Oct 2020, at 08:38, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

>

> I agree with Jordi that as we move the Policy Transfer proposal to board, can we have the final document that is going to board. Secondly, I also agree that we should know what is staff's final assessment on the proposal.

>

> But the question is, does this need extension of time on the last call? If it does, then It is worth the extension, however Staff are listening and will have to act immediately.

>

>

>

> Cheers,

>

> Daniel

>

> On 08/10/2020 8:42 am, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:

>> Hi Moses, all,

>>

>> I feel that there is a fundamental mistake here and I beg you to reconsider it.

>>

>> You've not waited for the staff confirmation about the reciprocity of the Inter-RIR transfers. What happens if now the staff comes back and confirms that we can’t decide in our policy what do to in other regions, so there is no reciprocity and so, we can’t implement this policy?

>>

>> Accordingly, I strongly suggest that you change your mind, following section 3.5 of the PDP: “A person who disagrees with the actions taken by the Chair(s) shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the PDWG”.

>>

>> The reasons for this are:

>> • The only valid proposal version is the one that is published at the web site and then announced to the list. The authors did changes several times, that aren’t there. As we are discussing version 2, we should have a version 2.x to show those.

>> • The staff must confirm the reciprocity of the last 2.x version in the list. As indicated in 3.4.3, you can extend the last-call to ensure that this is matched.

>> • This and other aspects, have been indicated several times by myself and others during the last-call. Those are valid-objections that remain unresolved and if you extend the last-call and agree with the latest changes from the authors, then could make sense, otherwise, it is impossible that you can declare the last-call and still “consensus”.

>>

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jordi

>>

>> @jordipalet

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> El 8/10/20 1:37, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com> escribió:

>>

>> Hello PDWG members,

>>

>> Following the last online PPM held on 16th-17th September 2020. Last call was announced on 21st September 2020 for the following policy proposals.

>> · Board Prerogatives on the PDP

>> · Resource Transfer Policy

>> This is to further announce that the last call period for the above proposals has ended, based on feedback received from the community and the editorial changes made by authors to address community concerns, the consensus decision from AFRINIC32 is still maintained.

>>

>> Co-Chairs will now send a report to the Board recommending ratification of the two above proposals in line with CPM 3.0.

>>

>> Regards,

>>

>> Co-Chairs

>>

>> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>> **********************************************

>> IPv4 is over

>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

>> http://www.theipv6company.com

>> The IPv6 Company

>>

>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

>>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>>

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd





More information about the RPD mailing list