[rpd] Decisions and summary on policy proposals discussed during the online Policy meeting (AFRINIC 32)

[Daniel Yakmut]

Dear Fernando,

I think the most qualified persons to say whether "Transferred legacy 
resources will still be regarded as legacy resources" was stated in the 
policy proposal will be the authors (except if you are one - I am not 
sure of that now) and if such wasn't mentioned I don't want insinuate 
that Co-Chairs will create their own content.

However, it could also be an error, which can be corrected.

Simply

Daniel

On 21/09/2020 2:14 am, Fernando Frediani wrote:

> On 20/09/2020 21:04, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:

>>

>> <clip>

>>

>> 10.Resource Transfer Policy

>>

>> This proposal aims to introduce Inter RIR transfer. However, it has 

>> the following opposition

>>

>> a.Issues with Legacy holder transfer is potentially considered 

>> none-reciprocal by ARIN

>>

>> b.Potential abuse of AFRINIC free pool without the time limit of 

>> receiving an allocation from AFRINIC.

>>

>> Chairs Decision: The proposal is the least contested of all the 3 

>> competing proposals. However because of the community’s desire and 

>> clear expression for the  need for an Inter RIR transfer, we, the 

>> Co-chairs, believe that in the interest of the community we should 

>> focus on a proposal rather than several similar ones. This desire was 

>> clearly expressed at the AFRINIC 31 meeting in Angola. Therefore, We 

>> suggest that the authors of this proposal make the following amendments:

>>

>> ·5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive further IPv4 

>> allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after 

>> the transfer.

>>

>> ·5.7.4.3. Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as 

>> legacy resources.

>>

>

> I don't remember during the discussion of this proposal someone making 

> a point for legacy resources once transferred to remain with legacy 

> status. It doesn't make sense at all.

> In all RIRs I know any legacy resources once transferred looses the 

> legacy status and that makes *a lot of sense* in order to end up with 

> a historical distortion to the system and favor resources end up on 

> organizations who really justify for them now a days.

>

> Can the Co-Chairs point in which part of the discussion of this 

> proposal this claim was made in order to consider that a rough 

> consensus ? I have searched in the RPD Archives on the content of this 

> discussion for months and couldn't find any mention to this point.

>

> Thanks

> Fernando

>

>> Chairs Decision: Provided that the above are amended, the decisions 

>> is Rough Consensus is achieved

>>

>> Based on the above, The updated version of the follow proposal which 

>> achieved rough consensus would be posted on the PDWG website

>>

>> *1.**Board Prerogatives *

>>

>> *2.**Resource Transfer Policy*

>>

>> Therefore, these two policies are now on last call.

>>

>>

>> Co-Chair

>> PDWG

>>

>> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>,Weekly Bulletin 

>> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 

>> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 

>> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200922/f78cabb6/attachment-0001.html>