[rpd] Decisions and summary on policy proposals discussed during the online Policy meeting (AFRINIC 32)

[ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE]

Dear Fernando,
It was mentioned durring the PPM. Please watch the recordings.
Thanks

Co-Chair

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:19 AM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>
wrote:


> On 20/09/2020 21:04, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:

>

>

> <clip>

>

>

>

> 10.   Resource Transfer Policy

>

> This proposal aims to introduce Inter RIR transfer. However, it has the

> following opposition

>

> a.                   Issues with Legacy holder transfer is potentially

> considered none-reciprocal by ARIN

>

> b.                  Potential abuse of AFRINIC free pool without the time

> limit of receiving an allocation from AFRINIC.

>

> Chairs Decision: The proposal is the least contested of all the 3

> competing proposals. However because of the community’s desire and clear

> expression for the  need for an Inter RIR transfer, we, the Co-chairs,

> believe that in the interest of the community we should focus on a proposal

> rather than several similar ones. This desire was clearly expressed at the

> AFRINIC 31 meeting in Angola. Therefore, We suggest that the authors of

> this proposal make the following amendments:

>

> ·         5.7.3.2  Source entities are not eligible to receive further

> IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after the

> transfer.

>

> ·         5.7.4.3. Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as

> legacy resources.

>

>

> I don't remember during the discussion of this proposal someone making a

> point for legacy resources once transferred to remain with legacy status.

> It doesn't make sense at all.

> In all RIRs I know any legacy resources once transferred looses the legacy

> status and that makes *a lot of sense* in order to end up with a

> historical distortion to the system and favor resources end up on

> organizations who really justify for them now a days.

>

> Can the Co-Chairs point in which part of the discussion of this proposal

> this claim was made in order to consider that a rough consensus ? I have

> searched in the RPD Archives on the content of this discussion for months

> and couldn't find any mention to this point.

>

> Thanks

> Fernando

>

> Chairs Decision: Provided that the above are amended, the decisions is

> Rough Consensus is achieved

>

>

>

> Based on the above, The updated version of the follow proposal which

> achieved rough consensus would be posted on the PDWG website

>

> *1.       **Board Prerogatives *

>

> *2.       **Resource Transfer Policy*

>

> Therefore, these two policies are now on last call.

>

> Co-Chair

> PDWG

>

> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin

> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal

> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal

> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200921/5fbfacf3/attachment-0001.html>