[rpd] Decisions and summary on policy proposals discussed during the online Policy meeting (AFRINIC 32)

[ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE]

Dear Fernando,
It was mentioned durring the PPM. Please watch the recordings.
Thanks

Co-Chair

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:19 AM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 20/09/2020 21:04, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:
>
>
> <clip>
>
>
>
> 10.   Resource Transfer Policy
>
> This proposal aims to introduce Inter RIR transfer. However, it has the
> following opposition
>
> a.                   Issues with Legacy holder transfer is potentially
> considered none-reciprocal by ARIN
>
> b.                  Potential abuse of AFRINIC free pool without the time
> limit of receiving an allocation from AFRINIC.
>
> Chairs Decision: The proposal is the least contested of all the 3
> competing proposals. However because of the community’s desire and clear
> expression for the  need for an Inter RIR transfer, we, the Co-chairs,
> believe that in the interest of the community we should focus on a proposal
> rather than several similar ones. This desire was clearly expressed at the
> AFRINIC 31 meeting in Angola. Therefore, We suggest that the authors of
> this proposal make the following amendments:
>
> ·         5.7.3.2  Source entities are not eligible to receive further
> IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after the
> transfer.
>
> ·         5.7.4.3. Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as
> legacy resources.
>
>
> I don't remember during the discussion of this proposal someone making a
> point for legacy resources once transferred to remain with legacy status.
> It doesn't make sense at all.
> In all RIRs I know any legacy resources once transferred looses the legacy
> status and that makes *a lot of sense* in order to end up with a
> historical distortion to the system and favor resources end up on
> organizations who really justify for them now a days.
>
> Can the Co-Chairs point in which part of the discussion of this proposal
> this claim was made in order to consider that a rough consensus ? I have
> searched in the RPD Archives on the content of this discussion for months
> and couldn't find any mention to this point.
>
> Thanks
> Fernando
>
> Chairs Decision: Provided that the above are amended, the decisions is
> Rough Consensus is achieved
>
>
>
> Based on the above, The updated version of the follow proposal which
> achieved rough consensus would be posted on the PDWG website
>
> *1.       **Board Prerogatives *
>
> *2.       **Resource Transfer Policy*
>
> Therefore, these two policies are now on last call.
>
> Co-Chair
> PDWG
>
> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin
> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal
> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal
> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>

-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200921/5fbfacf3/attachment.html>