[rpd] New Proposal Received | Simple PDP Update for the new “Normal” (Draft-1)

[Cathie Jay]

Dear Jordi, dear community,

I oppose this policy because of the way in which consensus is reached.
The current policy stipulates that consensus should be reached through
the balancing of the mailing list and forum, and not during the PPM.
Such policy could pave the way for the intrusion of fake emails within
the discussion, which could endanger the process of reaching a fair
consensus, and jeopardize the process of policy-making. In addition,
it would significantly undermine the work of the co-chairs who will
facilitate the discussion.

All best wishes,

Cathie

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD
<rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

>

> Hi Chloe,

>

>

>

> Exactly! I just responded to that to Gaby.

>

>

>

> Tks!

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Jordi

>

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> El 9/9/20 13:00, "Chloe Kung" <chloe.kung.public at gmail.com> escribió:

>

>

>

> Hi,

>

>

>

> I actually think section 3.4.3 is adequate as the discussion period of each policy proposal is a good 8 weeks. If there is no major objection based on technical justification submitted during the 8 weeks, the chance of having one during the last call period is very small. Even so, the community still have more time than needed to address and discuss the matter. Also this section states and I quote "Within 1 week after the end of the last call, the Working Group Chairs shall confirm whether consensus is maintained.” So if there is such case, meaning the consensus cannot be maintained, it will fall back into the discussion period anyway.

>

>

>

> Best,

>

> Chloe

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd