[rpd] Revised Proposal | Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-2)

[Mike Burns]

Hi Willy,

Appreciate the notice, but I was aware of this because somebody brings it up whenever "RFC2050" appears.
Nonetheless it is immaterial to the original intent of the registries, which I evoked through the use of the adjective "ancient".
My point stands. Our purpose was to conserve and register addresses, not to choose between good and bad uses.
The market provides conservation; we must register accurately and prevent the imposition of policies which lead to inaccurate registrations.

Regards,
Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Willy Manga <mangawilly at gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:11 AM
To: rpd at afrinic.net
Subject: Re: [rpd] Revised Proposal | Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-2)

Hi,

just a short notice.

On 14/09/2020 23:18, Mike Burns wrote:

> Hello,

> [...]

> We don’t want registries deciding good and evil uses for addresses, we want them accurately maintaining a list of unique numbers and their registrants, per the ancient RFC2050.


obsoleted by RFC7020

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7020


-- 
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/