Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Policy Impact

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Wed Jun 3 15:24:18 UTC 2020




On 3/Jun/20 17:12, Owen DeLong wrote:

> just a lot of noise about a very minor error.



> In order for ROAs to have helped, the upstream providers would need to have done ROV. Of course, given that Seacom left stale route objects in the IRR, it’s just as likely they would have left stale ROAs sitting in the database which would have rendered any ability for RPKI to address this event useless.



> There was no problem contacting the parties in question and had Mark reached out to the registered contacts on the resources (vs. publicly posting a tirade without the facts), it would have been promptly addressed without all the fanfare. It was promptly addressed once the matter was communicated.

>


Not to worry, Owen - we are above your attempts to drag us into whatever
version of truth you want to posit.

You can play that game all by yourself, mate.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200603/1fb4a3f3/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list