[rpd] PDP issues because the lack of the confirmation of dates for the new PPM

[Jordi Palet Martínez]

Thanks Noah, very well said.

 

The fact that somebody that is not a co-author, and I recall was even not supporting the proposal (I may be wrong here in my recalling), is having the same view, is a very interesting point.

 

However, as said before this is a discussion that falls much beyond than *this specific proposal*.

 

If the board or committees (whatever committee), which have something to say related to the PDP (appeals, nominations, etc.), believe that they should be able to change what the PDP is stating, this means restricting the PDP and the rights of the community. This *must not be decided* by a committee, but the PDP itself via a policy proposal.

 

Otherwise that is next? May be “the candidates to co-chairs shall bring a pink tie in the presentation intro” or “the appeal can’t be submitted by the author(s), it must be another member of the community”.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 8/5/20 15:42, "Noah" <noah at neo.co.tz> escribió:

 

 

On Fri, 8 May 2020, 11:13 ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE, <oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:

 

As far as we Co-chairs are concerned the ruling of the appeal committe means that our decision was upheld, 

 

Am not sure there was a ruling if the appeal committee indicated that the said appeal didnt meet the apparent requirements of three WG supporters even though there is WG support for the proposal itself archived. 

 

Even the so called support is subject to interpretations and clarification has been sought from the appeals committee as to what they mean after all their previous appeals  ruling years ago didnt spell out the 3 supporters requirement which was the basis of the recent dramatic ruling by AC.

 

 

 

meaning the policy proposal goes back to the discussion stage. 

 

Not so fast. 

 

IMHO, I am still waiting for clarification from the appeals committee in relationship to their contradictions of how they handled the previous appeals vs this particular case. [1] 

 

Noah

 

[1] If appeals committee doesnt clarify their ruling then the issue needs to be escalated beyond the PDWG and appeals committee itself since the working group is not satisfied with the co-chairs and appeals committees decisions.

 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200508/2fc3e263/attachment-0001.html>