[rpd] RPD Digest, Vol 160, Issue 46

[Blaise Fyama]

I do not support the RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned Afrinic
Address Space policy as it raises the concern about the control of
internet; should we have to let the government take all control of RPKI and
therefore representing a risk on how to make sure the use of Internet free
and legitimate. I therefore object it on the the engagement of a free
internet controlled by the community and its users.


Blaise FYAMA

Msc, PhD.

Professeur Associé

Secrétaire Général Académique Honoraire/UL

Doyen de la Faculté des Sciences Informatiques/UL

Chef de Département Génie Electrique/ESI-UNILU

Chef de Service Informatique/Polytech-UNILU

Consultant Informatique BIT/PAEJK

Tel: +243995579515





Le jeu. 30 janv. 2020 à 16:52, Kakel Mbumb <kakelmbumb at gmail.com> a écrit :


> Hello all, i think RPKI asks for bogon but does not stop bogon and it

> shall not involve in routing issue. Do we really want it to centralise the

> control of the internet because it can present potential risk for

> government to overtake it.

> Regards..

>

>

> *KAKEL MBUMB*

> *Chargé du Département Entrepreneuriat au Forum National de la Jeunesse

> (FNJ)*

>

> *Coordinator, YPARD-RDC Grand Katanga, Agricultural Development through

> Youths*

>

> *Project Vice Coordinator, Agribusiness Cooperative - CAAPJECO*

> *Consultant, RESOJEC, Youth Chamber of Commerce*

> *Country Representative, Mashinani Hub ,ICT skills for rural communities*

> *Yali RLC EA Cohort 6 Alumnus, Business & Entrepreneurship*

> *Lubumbashi, Haut-Katanga Province*

> *Democratic Republic of the Congo (Congo, DRC)*

>

> *Phone: +243 993 656 038 (Whatsapp) *

> *Facebook: **https://www.facebook.com/kakelmbumb

> <https://www.facebook.com/kakelmbumb>*

> *Twitter: **https://twitter.com/KakelMbumb

> <https://twitter.com/KakelMbumb>*

> *Linked in: **https://www.linkedin.com/in/kakel-mbumb-240534ba/

> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/kakel-mbumb-240534ba/>*

> *Skype: kakel.mbumb1*

>

>

>

>

> Le jeu. 30 janv. 2020 à 14:00, <rpd-request at afrinic.net> a écrit :

>

>> Send RPD mailing list submissions to

>>         rpd at afrinic.net

>>

>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

>>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

>>         rpd-request at afrinic.net

>>

>> You can reach the person managing the list at

>>         rpd-owner at afrinic.net

>>

>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

>> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."

>>

>>

>> Today's Topics:

>>

>>    1. Re: End of LAST call (Sander Steffann)

>>

>>

>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>

>> Message: 1

>> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:19:17 +0100

>> From: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>

>> To: Frank Habicht <geier at geier.ne.tz>

>> Cc: rpd at afrinic.net

>> Subject: Re: [rpd] End of LAST call

>> Message-ID: <0FCD7F85-3670-45B4-B73F-5028DB3F9BDC at steffann.nl>

>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

>>

>> Hi Frank & chairs,

>>

>> > There were no new problems or arguments that were not addresses, during

>> the last call.

>>

>> I think this is correct. As a community we should listen and try to

>> understand all objections. Once they are addressed (but not necessarily

>> accommodated) they should not block consensus anymore.

>>

>> > If that is a wrong understanding, we request guidance from the

>> co-chairs as to what the remaining problems are.

>>

>> It would be useful (at least for proposals which cause much discussion)

>> if the chairs could make a list of raised objections and whether or not

>> they have been addressed (where useful with links to the mailing list

>> archives). That way there is transparency on how their decision was reached.

>>

>> One example is

>> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2017-February/011987.html

>>

>> I do realise this is a lot of work. In the RIPE region we (when I was

>> still a chair) often got help from RIPE NCC. They would help us with making

>> the first draft, and then the chairs would verify that and publish it. It

>> always remains the responsibility of the chairs, but that doesn't mean they

>> have to refuse help :)

>>

>> Cheers,

>> Sander

>>

>> -------------- next part --------------

>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

>> Name: signature.asc

>> Type: application/pgp-signature

>> Size: 833 bytes

>> Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP

>> URL: <

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200129/6c7293ca/attachment-0001.sig

>> >

>>

>> ------------------------------

>>

>> Subject: Digest Footer

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>>

>> ------------------------------

>>

>> End of RPD Digest, Vol 160, Issue 46

>> ************************************

>>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200130/51247f2a/attachment-0001.html>