Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] [Community-Discuss] Community-Discuss Digest, Vol 551, Issue 1

Komi Elitcha kmw.elitcha at gmail.com
Sat Dec 14 15:48:10 UTC 2019


Hello Sander,

Can you point to the section of the PDP which allows chairs to make such
decision?

We have to stick to the PDP which has been declared by some as not broken.
If you think like us, that the PDP needs improvement, please say so and
contribute to the discussions around PDP-bis.

Thanks

- Komi

Le ven. 13 déc. 2019 à 14:16, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> a écrit :


> Hi,

>

> > The best thing to do with the review policy is to abandon it.

> Unfortunately, despite sustained opposition and an inability to bring it to

> consensus, the authors persist.

>

> At some point the chairs are perfectly allowed to declare non-consensus

> and drop the proposal. It's their responsibility to make sure this working

> group functions, and wasting time on a proposal that is not getting

> consensus is harmful to this working group and its participants.

>

> It's not something to be done lightly, but I think that time has come…

> Sander

>

> _______________________________________________

> Community-Discuss mailing list

> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>



--
--KE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20191214/84e3c8c7/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list