[rpd] new version of policy proposal AFPUB-2019-ASN-DRAFT03 "Multihoming not required for ASN"

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Owen,

 

As I see no opposition to your points and I also agree with them, I’m editing a new version that I shall publish in a while.

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 13/11/19 2:07, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> escribió:

 

 



On Nov 12, 2019, at 02:04 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

 

Hi Owen,

In the previous meeting, that sentence with the private ASNs was already there, nobody objected to it, including yourself. That's why I didn't modified that part.

 

I apologize for not previously noticing it.



I think it provides clarity, however, if is a problem for anyone, I'm happy to remove that. A middle way alterative is a footnote:

 

A footnote still duplicates data unnecessarily and creates a need to update the CPM any time the IETF chooses to adjust the private ASN range(s). We should avoid duplicating IETF information in policy to avoid the risk of it falling out of sync.

 

It is important to determine which sites require unique AS Numbers.  Sites which do not require a unique AS Number should use one or more of the AS Numbers reserved for private use*.

*Those numbers are: 64,512 - 65,535 and 4,200,000,000 - 4,294,967,294 (RFC1930, RFC6996 and possible future updates) - date of publication.

Will you agree on that?

Regarding your point on 7.2.2, your wording "technical need", an ISP that has a single upstream and that single upstream is mandating to provide BGP a public ASN, I think will not fall into "technical need”.

 

It certainly falls into “Unique Routing Policy”, but I would say that it also meets the definition of “technical need”, since the affected organization cannot technically route their addresses via said provider without a public ASN.

 

Owen




Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet



El 12/11/19 2:57, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> escribió:

   Oppose as written.

   Adding the specific AS numbers for private use to 7.2 is an unnecessary duplication of data that has no mechanism for preserving synchronization with reality.

   Take that out and I would support the policy as written, tough I would prefer to replace 7.2.2 with:

   7.2.2 Show a unique routing policy or demonstrate a technical need for a coordinated globally unique ASN.

   Owen




On Nov 11, 2019, at 01:50 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

Hi all,

One of the policy proposals that I've updated a week ago, is attached in PDF.

As usual, it tries to address the inputs from the list, meeting and staff analysis.

Please, let me know any inputs.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet





**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

<AfriNIC-ASN-no-multihoming-v3.pdf>_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd






**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.




_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd






**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20191125/8a9b3b90/attachment.html>