Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Assisted Registry Checks

Nasir Faruk nasirfaruk at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 08:20:46 UTC 2019


@SOUAD ABIDI,

I think the author sent ARC document as a suggestion or rather something
worth looking at that could assists to shape the discussion on INR. I am
sure it's presented as a new proposal.

@Dewole, i hope i'm right?

Best Regards

Faruk.


..........................................................................................................






On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:15 PM <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:

> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>         rpd at afrinic.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         rpd-request at afrinic.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:14:18 +0200
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> To: <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
> Message-ID: <DCC63A29-2FB8-4117-8D8F-15FA221E32CE at consulintel.es>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Souad,
>
>
>
> Some inputs below, in-line.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El 25/6/19 16:08, "SOUAD ABIDI" <fs_abidi at esi.dz> escribi?:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I think this policy needs to grow a little more and get mature.
>
>
>
>  The policy authors need to answer the points raised by the community
> since I believe the proposal is from, to the community and the
> bidirectional interaction would be useful to go forward in the process.
>
>
>
> >From one hand ,what I suggest is, an ultimate process for the review,
> sure it won't detect all the  loopholes but we can get some resources back
> to Afrinic as a first step and then evaluate.
>
>
> I would not  support the random checking but an automatized one would be
> better.
>
>
>
> Agree, no random and not ?Afrinic MUST do a complete audit in case of
> another member complain? as this can be used as a ?hurt a competitor tool?.
> Afrinic can be informed (even without the policy), but they must be able to
> decided what ?degree? of audit they take.
>
>
>
> >From another hand  and based on :
>
>
>
> a) INTERNET is globally ,regardless of the economical differences
>
>
>
> b) The other RIRs have already implemented the review.
>
>
>
> I don?t agree on this one, but it is matter of language (which turns
> dangerous here). Other RIRs have in their RSAs the chance to do audits
> (none of them has the ?review? policy that we are discussion here ? because
> there are important differences). Some have processes (most of them
> developed by staff). They aren?t really policies in all them.
>
>
>
> Some of them have policies for resource recovery (as a protection to the
> members, not as a tool to the community, Owen commented this already on the
> meeting and I already sent on Monday a draft proposal for that). The
> resource recovery is already part of the RSA in every RIR. The policy is in
> this case meant to ensure that the members have opportunities before the
> recovery, in case it was a mistake, lack of knowledge, or whatever, not
> continued bad-faith.
>
>
>
> So,  we can get ,probably, from them the review system they are using in
> their audit.
>
>
>
>
>
> I am  neither supporting or opposing this proposal, but I would like to
> analyze the two options we have on the table
>
>  so we can make a fair analysis based on arguments that help the african
> community not personal business .
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Souad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le mar. 25 juin 2019 ? 08:55, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <
> rpd at afrinic.net> a ?crit :
>
> Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if there is an
> actual need for something else or not, or just provinding inputs to the
> "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it) process.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
> ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>
>     I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a minimum that
>     staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no big deal);
>
>     It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing discussion on
>     resource review.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Dewole.
>
>     On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>     > Hi Dewole,
>     >
>     > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall correctly, in the case
> of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the staff itself, looking for an objetive
> and fair process, and avoiding "flase claims" about possible competitors.
>     >
>     > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694
>     >
>     > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit of the review
> policy proposal, and still allows any member that has suspicius information
> about another member to tell the staff.
>     >
>     > The staff will then review that information, but the main difference
> is that if they feel the information is wrong, they aren't mandated to
> start a complete audit.
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Jordi
>     > @jordipalet
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>     >
>     >      [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received: Internet Number
> Resources
>     >      Review by AFRINIC]
>     >
>     >      With the type of audit/review being discussed, the costs may
> vary
>     >      significantly from member to member - whether AFRINIC-side or
> Member-side.
>     >
>     >      I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE NCC has
> something simple
>     >      and time-efficient called Assisted Registry Checks and if I
> remember
>     >      correctly, they aim to check records for every member once in
> two years.
>     >      While we await the audit/review/recovery policy, it would be
> nice to see
>     >      AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even before a member
> comes for
>     >      a repeat allocation).
>     >
>     >      See
>     >
> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check
>     >
>     >
>     >      These are simple checks to ensure registry accuracy and I see
> no reason
>     >      why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC from checking the
> accuracy of
>     >      its records with the assistance of members.
>     >
>     >      This first step we can all agree on and staff can implement
> almost
>     >      immediately (in addition to the work they are already doing
> when members
>     >      come to them with issues arising from our lame-delegations and
>     >      no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).
>     >
>     >      Regards,
>     >
>     >      Dewole.
>     >
>     >
>     >      On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>     >      > Hi Ish,
>     >      >
>     >      > I understand that, but my point is that there are two sides
> of the cost. And both should be considered:
>     >      >
>     >      > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about average) for each
> review to an ISP.
>     >      >
>     >      > b) The cost for each member being reviewed (again we can get
> examples to calculate an average).
>     >      >
>     >      > Regards,
>     >      > Jordi
>     >      > @jordipalet
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun" <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>
> escribi?:
>     >      >
>     >      >      I only requested an indicative value. I didn't ask to
> consider all
>     >      >      possibilities (e.g litigation, big or small ISP etc).
> The idea is to
>     >      >      obtain an approximate cost figure to evaluate whether
> the mere
>     >      >      implementation of this policy brings a financial burden
> on AfriNIC.
>     >      >
>     >      >      Regards,
>     >      >
>     >      >      Ish Sookun
>     >      >
>     >      >      On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>     >      >      > I think there is one more cost to be considered here
> as well.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Each time an ISP gets the audit, it will need to
> dedicate staff for that.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > It is dificult to calculate ?how much? that means, as
> it may depend on
>     >      >      > many factors, such as how big is the ISP, how many
> resources they have,
>     >      >      > how many customers from different types (business,
> residential), what
>     >      >      > provisioning system they have, IPAM if any, level of
> ?automation? and
>     >      >      > ?inventory? of the network, etc.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > May be it is a good exersice for some of you to
> calculate (rought idea),
>     >      >      > how much staff/resources and how many weeks, this will
> take to you, if
>     >      >      > the policy it is implemented?
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > A few examples, could help the community to take a
> decision.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Regards,
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Jordi
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > @jordipalet
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola Akinfenwa" <
> akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng
>     >      >      > <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>> escribi?:
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Hello Andrew,
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > While I also agree that Staff provide information on
> the likely
>     >      >      > financial implication for the audit, I don't
> understand why there should
>     >      >      > be a separate allocation for litigation.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Is it wise for an organisation to budget funds for
> likely court cases
>     >      >      > when instead they should strive to prevent one in the
> first place?
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > For me, I think it is critical to ensure that Staff
> actions on any audit
>     >      >      > review does not amount to litigation. And this may be
> captured as a
>     >      >      > suggestion in the policy as well, if necessary.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Best!
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > Sent from my OnePlus mobile device! </>$aa;
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM Andrew Alston,
>     >      >      > <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
>     >      >      > <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>> wrote:
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     I would agree that these numbers would be useful -
> and must in
>     >      >      >     addition include contingent liability allocation
> for litigation that
>     >      >      >     could result due to implementation of this policy
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     Andrew
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of IP
> Strategy
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     *From:*Ish Sookun <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu
>     >      >      >     <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>
>     >      >      >     *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 5:39:19 PM
>     >      >      >     *To:* rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>     >      >      >     *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received:
> Internet Number
>     >      >      >     Resources Review by AFRINIC
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     It was expressed during the last meeting that this
> policy will have
>     >      >      >     financial implications on AfriNIC due to costs
> associated to auditing.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     Is it possible to obtain an approximate cost
> figure (from staff) that
>     >      >      >     such audits would entail?
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     Regards,
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     Ish Sookun
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole Ajao wrote:
>     >      >      >     > Dear PDWG members,
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > This is to inform you that authors of the policy
> proposal named
>     >      >      >     "Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC" have
> submitted an
>     >      >      >     updated version (Draft version 8) as included
> below. The URL will be
>     >      >      >     shared once published online.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Please take some time to go through the proposal
> contents and
>     >      >      >     provide your feedback.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Thank you.
>     >      >      >     > PDWG Co-Chairs
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > ------------------- Begin
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >     Name : Internet Number Resources Review by
> AFRINIC (Draft 8)
>     >      >      >     >     Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>     >      >      >     >     Status: Under Discussion
>     >      >      >     >     Date: 7 June 2019
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Authors:
>     >      >      >     >         (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud | <
> arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>     >      >      >     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
>     >      >      >     > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
>     >      >      >     <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>> | AUF/TogoRER
>     >      >      >     >         (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<
> jean.millogo at orange.com
>     >      >      >     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
>     >      >      >     > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
>     >      >      >     <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>>| Orange Burkina
>     >      >      >     >         (c) Marcus ADOMEY  <madomey at ug.edu.gh
>     >      >      >     <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>
>     >      >      >     > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh <mailto:
> madomey at ug.edu.gh>>>  |
>     >      >      >     University of Ghana
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by
> this Policy Proposal
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > As Internet Number resources are finite, their
> allocation is based on
>     >      >      >     > the operational needs of end-users and Internet
> Services Providers,
>     >      >      >     > while avoiding stockpiling in accordance with
> RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation
>     >      >      >     > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment
> policy CPM 6.5 and
>     >      >      >     Policy
>     >      >      >     > for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management
> in the AFRINIC
>     >      >      >     region CPM
>     >      >      >     > 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service
> Agreement (RSA) provides the
>     >      >      >     > framework for investigations of the usage of
> allocated Internet Number
>     >      >      >     > resources, defines members? obligation to
> cooperate and the
>     >      >      >     measures to
>     >      >      >     > be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to
> comply. The lack of such
>     >      >      >     > investigation or regular control can lead to
> inefficient usage of the
>     >      >      >     > Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and
> other type of abuses.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.0.1 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses
> the Problem
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > In order to ensure efficient and appropriate use
> of resources, AFRINIC
>     >      >      >     > shall conduct regular reviews of resource
> utilisation held by its
>     >      >      >     > members. This would allow recovery of any type
> of resource, where
>     >      >      >     usage
>     >      >      >     > is not in compliance with the RSA. Those
> resources can be reallocated
>     >      >      >     > for better usage.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.0.2 Proposal
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > The policy proposal will modify the CPM as
> follows:
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Regular reviews of resource utilisation are
> conducted by AFRINIC to
>     >      >      >     > ensure efficient and appropriate usage of
> resources. This allows for
>     >      >      >     > recovery of any type of resource where usage is
> not in compliance with
>     >      >      >     > the RSA; to allow such resources to be
> reallocated for better usage.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance
> with the terms
>     >      >      >     outlined in
>     >      >      >     > the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned
> resources, but priority
>     >      >      >     > goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed
> shall be selected
>     >      >      >     > according to the following classes:
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.3.1 Random
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random
> between the members who has
>     >      >      >     > not been reviewed for any other reasons in  the
> preceding 24 months.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.3.2 Selected
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >  Member is selected because of an internal
> report or due to a lack of
>     >      >      >     > contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.3.3 Reported:
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Here, members are reviewed either because:
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > A) They have requested the review themselves or
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > B) There has been a community complaint made
> against them that
>     >      >      >     warrants
>     >      >      >     > investigation. Complaints shall be backed by
> evidence and AFRINIC
>     >      >      >     staff
>     >      >      >     > shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to
> conduct the review. However
>     >      >      >     > this review is not applicable to a member  with
> the same resources
>     >      >      >     > portfolio on which a full review has been
> completed in the
>     >      >      >     preceding 24
>     >      >      >     > months.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >  AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion,
> after having assessed the
>     >      >      >     > nature of the evidence found in the community
> complaint, require that
>     >      >      >     > such evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a
> sworn affidavit or
>     >      >      >     (ii)
>     >      >      >     > declared to be true before a Commissioner of
> Oath.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence
> has been established in
>     >      >      >     > accordance with:
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > ?    Breach of AFRINIC policies
>     >      >      >     > ?    Breach of the provisions of the
> registration service agreement or
>     >      >      >     > other legal agreements between the organisation
> holding the
>     >      >      >     resource and
>     >      >      >     > AFRINIC.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery
> process on the portion of
>     >      >      >     > addresses found to be noncompliant.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the
> organisation and correct any
>     >      >      >     > discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in cases of
> fraudulent resource
>     >      >      >     > acquisition or  unlawful usage and abuse, the
> organization shall be
>     >      >      >     > given a minimum of six(6) months to effect the
> return of the
>     >      >      >     resources.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > If the organisation is cooperative and working
> in good faith to
>     >      >      >     > substantially restore compliance or has a valid
> need for
>     >      >      >     additional time
>     >      >      >     > to renumber out of the affected blocks, AFRINIC
> shall negotiate a
>     >      >      >     longer
>     >      >      >     > term.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > The acceptance level of compliance and duration
> of the longer term are
>     >      >      >     > at AFRINIC staff discretion.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the
> member did not
>     >      >      >     transfer
>     >      >      >     > the resources to meet other AFRINIC-approved
> needs as per adopted
>     >      >      >     policies
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >  AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be
> recovered for a period of
>     >      >      >     > three (3) months; during which the organisation
> may at any time, seek
>     >      >      >     > compliance or transfer the resources to other
> members
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >  After this period, the resource shall be
> recovered and therefore the
>     >      >      >     > records of the previous holder of the recovered
> resource shall be
>     >      >      >     > updated in AFRINIC?s databases.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > C)  Any Internet Number Resources recovered
> under this policy may be
>     >      >      >     > assigned/allocated under existing Allocation and
> Assignment Policies.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.5 Appeal procedure
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the
> right to appeal
>     >      >      >     against
>     >      >      >     > the results on the review within the four weeks
> following
>     >      >      >     communication
>     >      >      >     > of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall follow
> an arbitration process
>     >      >      >     > as provided for in the
>     >      >      >     > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil
> Procedure) of the Republic of
>     >      >      >     > Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an
> aggrieved party, suggest a
>     >      >      >     > pool of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable
> volunteers from the
>     >      >      >     > community.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.6 Compliance Report
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful
> report describing review
>     >      >      >     > activities, in accordance with all applicable
> laws and regulations.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 13.7 Acknowledgements
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri
> (become Afrinic GC
>     >      >      >     Chair), Mr
>     >      >      >     > Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member)  and
> Mr Alain P. Aina for
>     >      >      >     > their  contributions  in the development of this
> Policy proposal.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > The authors also thank the community for the
> discussions and
>     >      >      >     contributions.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 4.0 Revision History
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 18 May 2016
>     >      >      >     >   Version 1.0
>     >      >      >     > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
>     >      >      >     > - Posted on RPD list
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 05 Aug 2016
>     >      >      >     >   Version 2.0
>     >      >      >     > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
>     >      >      >     > - Change on the policy?s name
>     >      >      >     > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
>     >      >      >     > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 18 Nov 2016
>     >      >      >     > Version 3.0
>     >      >      >     > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
>     >      >      >     > - Update of section 3.3.3 from discussions on
> mailing list
>     >      >      >     > - Update of section 3.7 (Acknowledgements) to
> thank the community for
>     >      >      >     > discussions and contributions
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 11 Apr 2017
>     >      >      >     > Version 4.0
>     >      >      >     > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
>     >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
>     >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
>     >      >      >     > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 21 Oct. 2107
>     >      >      >     > Version 5.0
>     >      >      >     > - Fifth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
>     >      >      >     > - Adding the paragraph C to 13.3.3. according to
> the legal counsel
>     >      >      >     > proposition
>     >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.5 to comply with
> staff and legal
>     >      >      >     assessment
>     >      >      >     > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.6 to comply with
> staff assessment and
>     >      >      >     > avoid any ambiguity
>     >      >      >     > - Changing the co-authors list
>     >      >      >     > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
>     >      >      >     > - Amending 13.4 (B) to  reflect the Transfer
> policies
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2018
>     >      >      >     > Version 6.0
>     >      >      >     > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
>     >      >      >     > - Removing categorisation between membership in
> random class
>     >      >      >     section 13.3.1
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 06 Apr. 2019
>     >      >      >     > Version 07
>     >      >      >     > - Seventh Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07
>     >      >      >     > - Modifying section 13.4 Paragraph A) to clarify
> the resources
>     >      >      >     recovery
>     >      >      >     > process: set conditions  under which a member
> could be given
>     >      >      >     longer term
>     >      >      >     >  to effect the return of  affected resources.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > 29 may. 2019
>     >      >      >     > Version 08
>     >      >      >     > -  Eighth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
>     >      >      >     > -  Section 13.3.1 changes to  : "..The member is
> chosen by AFRINIC at
>     >      >      >     > random between the members who has not been
> reviewed for any other
>     >      >      >     > reasons in  the preceding 24 months."
>     >      >      >     > -  Section  13.4  last paragraph changes to :
> "AFRINIC shall initiate
>     >      >      >     > ... on the portion of addresses found to be
> noncompliant."
>     >      >      >     > -   Section 13.5 changes to  ?Reviewed members
> who are not satisfied
>     >      >      >     > have the right to appeal against the results on
> the review within the
>     >      >      >     > four weeks following communication of the
> results by AFRINIC??..?
>     >      >      >     > -  Typos and grammatical errors fixed.
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >      >      >     > End
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >     > _______________________________________________
>     >      >      >     > RPD mailing list
>     >      >      >     > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     >      >      >     > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >      >      >     >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     _______________________________________________
>     >      >      >     RPD mailing list
>     >      >      >     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     >      >      >     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >     _______________________________________________
>     >      >      >     RPD mailing list
>     >      >      >     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     >      >      >     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > _______________________________________________ RPD
> mailing list
>     >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > **********************************************
>     >      >      > IPv4 is over
>     >      >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>     >      >      > http://www.theipv6company.com
>     >      >      > The IPv6 Company
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > This electronic message contains information which may
> be privileged or
>     >      >      > confidential. The information is intended to be for
> the exclusive use of
>     >      >      > the individual(s) named above and further
> non-explicilty authorized
>     >      >      > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
> contents of this
>     >      >      > information, even if partially, including attached
> files, is strictly
>     >      >      > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense.
> If you are not the
>     >      >      > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution
>     >      >      > or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including
>     >      >      > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
> considered a criminal
>     >      >      > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to
> inform about this
>     >      >      > communication and delete it.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > _______________________________________________
>     >      >      > RPD mailing list
>     >      >      > RPD at afrinic.net
>     >      >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >      >      >
>     >      >
>     >      >      _______________________________________________
>     >      >      RPD mailing list
>     >      >      RPD at afrinic.net
>     >      >      https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      > **********************************************
>     >      > IPv4 is over
>     >      > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>     >      > http://www.theipv6company.com
>     >      > The IPv6 Company
>     >      >
>     >      > This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      > _______________________________________________
>     >      > RPD mailing list
>     >      > RPD at afrinic.net
>     >      > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >
>     >      _______________________________________________
>     >      RPD mailing list
>     >      RPD at afrinic.net
>     >      https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > **********************************************
>     > IPv4 is over
>     > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>     > http://www.theipv6company.com
>     > The IPv6 Company
>     >
>     > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > RPD mailing list
>     > RPD at afrinic.net
>     > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/74c12f7b/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 195
> *************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/4f5a7d89/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list