Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
Nasir Faruk
nasirfaruk at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 08:20:46 UTC 2019
@SOUAD ABIDI,
I think the author sent ARC document as a suggestion or rather something
worth looking at that could assists to shape the discussion on INR. I am
sure it's presented as a new proposal.
@Dewole, i hope i'm right?
Best Regards
Faruk.
..........................................................................................................
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:15 PM <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:
> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
> rpd at afrinic.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rpd-request at afrinic.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:14:18 +0200
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> To: <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
> Message-ID: <DCC63A29-2FB8-4117-8D8F-15FA221E32CE at consulintel.es>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Souad,
>
>
>
> Some inputs below, in-line.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El 25/6/19 16:08, "SOUAD ABIDI" <fs_abidi at esi.dz> escribi?:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I think this policy needs to grow a little more and get mature.
>
>
>
> The policy authors need to answer the points raised by the community
> since I believe the proposal is from, to the community and the
> bidirectional interaction would be useful to go forward in the process.
>
>
>
> >From one hand ,what I suggest is, an ultimate process for the review,
> sure it won't detect all the loopholes but we can get some resources back
> to Afrinic as a first step and then evaluate.
>
>
> I would not support the random checking but an automatized one would be
> better.
>
>
>
> Agree, no random and not ?Afrinic MUST do a complete audit in case of
> another member complain? as this can be used as a ?hurt a competitor tool?.
> Afrinic can be informed (even without the policy), but they must be able to
> decided what ?degree? of audit they take.
>
>
>
> >From another hand and based on :
>
>
>
> a) INTERNET is globally ,regardless of the economical differences
>
>
>
> b) The other RIRs have already implemented the review.
>
>
>
> I don?t agree on this one, but it is matter of language (which turns
> dangerous here). Other RIRs have in their RSAs the chance to do audits
> (none of them has the ?review? policy that we are discussion here ? because
> there are important differences). Some have processes (most of them
> developed by staff). They aren?t really policies in all them.
>
>
>
> Some of them have policies for resource recovery (as a protection to the
> members, not as a tool to the community, Owen commented this already on the
> meeting and I already sent on Monday a draft proposal for that). The
> resource recovery is already part of the RSA in every RIR. The policy is in
> this case meant to ensure that the members have opportunities before the
> recovery, in case it was a mistake, lack of knowledge, or whatever, not
> continued bad-faith.
>
>
>
> So, we can get ,probably, from them the review system they are using in
> their audit.
>
>
>
>
>
> I am neither supporting or opposing this proposal, but I would like to
> analyze the two options we have on the table
>
> so we can make a fair analysis based on arguments that help the african
> community not personal business .
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Souad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le mar. 25 juin 2019 ? 08:55, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <
> rpd at afrinic.net> a ?crit :
>
> Agree, however, by starting it, the community can see if there is an
> actual need for something else or not, or just provinding inputs to the
> "ARC" (whatever the staff calls it) process.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
> ?El 25/6/19 1:27, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
>
> I should point out that my suggestion of the ARCs is a minimum that
> staff should be able to carry out starting now (with no big deal);
>
> It is not necessarily an alternative to the ongoing discussion on
> resource review.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dewole.
>
> On 6/24/2019 10:12 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> > Hi Dewole,
> >
> > This is actually a good idea, and if I recall correctly, in the case
> of RIPE NCC, this was designed by the staff itself, looking for an objetive
> and fair process, and avoiding "flase claims" about possible competitors.
> >
> > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-694
> >
> > You can see that this doesn't have the "random" bit of the review
> policy proposal, and still allows any member that has suspicius information
> about another member to tell the staff.
> >
> > The staff will then review that information, but the main difference
> is that if they feel the information is wrong, they aren't mandated to
> start a complete audit.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jordi
> > @jordipalet
> >
> >
> >
> > ?El 24/6/19 22:45, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribi?:
> >
> > [was Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received: Internet Number
> Resources
> > Review by AFRINIC]
> >
> > With the type of audit/review being discussed, the costs may
> vary
> > significantly from member to member - whether AFRINIC-side or
> Member-side.
> >
> > I have however in the past mentioned that RIPE NCC has
> something simple
> > and time-efficient called Assisted Registry Checks and if I
> remember
> > correctly, they aim to check records for every member once in
> two years.
> > While we await the audit/review/recovery policy, it would be
> nice to see
> > AFRINIC start to implement basic checks (even before a member
> comes for
> > a repeat allocation).
> >
> > See
> >
> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/assisted-registry-check
> >
> >
> > These are simple checks to ensure registry accuracy and I see
> no reason
> > why anyone would try to discourage AFRINIC from checking the
> accuracy of
> > its records with the assistance of members.
> >
> > This first step we can all agree on and staff can implement
> almost
> > immediately (in addition to the work they are already doing
> when members
> > come to them with issues arising from our lame-delegations and
> > no-reverse-unless-assigned policies).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dewole.
> >
> >
> > On 6/24/2019 7:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> > > Hi Ish,
> > >
> > > I understand that, but my point is that there are two sides
> of the cost. And both should be considered:
> > >
> > > a) The cost for Afrinic (lets talk about average) for each
> review to an ISP.
> > >
> > > b) The cost for each member being reviewed (again we can get
> examples to calculate an average).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jordi
> > > @jordipalet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ?El 24/6/19 20:00, "Ish Sookun" <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>
> escribi?:
> > >
> > > I only requested an indicative value. I didn't ask to
> consider all
> > > possibilities (e.g litigation, big or small ISP etc).
> The idea is to
> > > obtain an approximate cost figure to evaluate whether
> the mere
> > > implementation of this policy brings a financial burden
> on AfriNIC.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ish Sookun
> > >
> > > On 6/24/19 7:31 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> > > > I think there is one more cost to be considered here
> as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Each time an ISP gets the audit, it will need to
> dedicate staff for that.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It is dificult to calculate ?how much? that means, as
> it may depend on
> > > > many factors, such as how big is the ISP, how many
> resources they have,
> > > > how many customers from different types (business,
> residential), what
> > > > provisioning system they have, IPAM if any, level of
> ?automation? and
> > > > ?inventory? of the network, etc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > May be it is a good exersice for some of you to
> calculate (rought idea),
> > > > how much staff/resources and how many weeks, this will
> take to you, if
> > > > the policy it is implemented?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A few examples, could help the community to take a
> decision.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Jordi
> > > >
> > > > @jordipalet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El 24/6/19 17:25, "Timothy Ola Akinfenwa" <
> akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng
> > > > <mailto:akin.akinfenwa at uniosun.edu.ng>> escribi?:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > While I also agree that Staff provide information on
> the likely
> > > > financial implication for the audit, I don't
> understand why there should
> > > > be a separate allocation for litigation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is it wise for an organisation to budget funds for
> likely court cases
> > > > when instead they should strive to prevent one in the
> first place?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For me, I think it is critical to ensure that Staff
> actions on any audit
> > > > review does not amount to litigation. And this may be
> captured as a
> > > > suggestion in the policy as well, if necessary.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best!
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my OnePlus mobile device! </>$aa;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, 3:53 PM Andrew Alston,
> > > > <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
> > > > <mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would agree that these numbers would be useful -
> and must in
> > > > addition include contingent liability allocation
> for litigation that
> > > > could result due to implementation of this policy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Liquid Telecommunications - Group Head Of IP
> Strategy
> > > >
> > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > *From:*Ish Sookun <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu
> > > > <mailto:ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu>>
> > > > *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2019 5:39:19 PM
> > > > *To:* rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
> > > > *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Proposal Update received:
> Internet Number
> > > > Resources Review by AFRINIC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear PDWG Co-Chairs,
> > > >
> > > > It was expressed during the last meeting that this
> policy will have
> > > > financial implications on AfriNIC due to costs
> associated to auditing.
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to obtain an approximate cost
> figure (from staff) that
> > > > such audits would entail?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ish Sookun
> > > >
> > > > On 6/8/19 10:24 PM, Dewole Ajao wrote:
> > > > > Dear PDWG members,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is to inform you that authors of the policy
> proposal named
> > > > "Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC" have
> submitted an
> > > > updated version (Draft version 8) as included
> below. The URL will be
> > > > shared once published online.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take some time to go through the proposal
> contents and
> > > > provide your feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > PDWG Co-Chairs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------- Begin
> > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Name : Internet Number Resources Review by
> AFRINIC (Draft 8)
> > > > > Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
> > > > > Status: Under Discussion
> > > > > Date: 7 June 2019
> > > > >
> > > > > Authors:
> > > > > (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud | <
> arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
> > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>
> > > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg
> > > > <mailto:arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg>>> | AUF/TogoRER
> > > > > (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<
> jean.millogo at orange.com
> > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>
> > > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com
> > > > <mailto:jean.millogo at orange.com>>>| Orange Burkina
> > > > > (c) Marcus ADOMEY <madomey at ug.edu.gh
> > > > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh>
> > > > > <mailto:madomey at ug.edu.gh <mailto:
> madomey at ug.edu.gh>>> |
> > > > University of Ghana
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by
> this Policy Proposal
> > > > >
> > > > > As Internet Number resources are finite, their
> allocation is based on
> > > > > the operational needs of end-users and Internet
> Services Providers,
> > > > > while avoiding stockpiling in accordance with
> RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation
> > > > > Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment
> policy CPM 6.5 and
> > > > Policy
> > > > > for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management
> in the AFRINIC
> > > > region CPM
> > > > > 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service
> Agreement (RSA) provides the
> > > > > framework for investigations of the usage of
> allocated Internet Number
> > > > > resources, defines members? obligation to
> cooperate and the
> > > > measures to
> > > > > be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to
> comply. The lack of such
> > > > > investigation or regular control can lead to
> inefficient usage of the
> > > > > Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and
> other type of abuses.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0.1 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses
> the Problem
> > > > >
> > > > > In order to ensure efficient and appropriate use
> of resources, AFRINIC
> > > > > shall conduct regular reviews of resource
> utilisation held by its
> > > > > members. This would allow recovery of any type
> of resource, where
> > > > usage
> > > > > is not in compliance with the RSA. Those
> resources can be reallocated
> > > > > for better usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0.2 Proposal
> > > > >
> > > > > The policy proposal will modify the CPM as
> follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
> > > > >
> > > > > Regular reviews of resource utilisation are
> conducted by AFRINIC to
> > > > > ensure efficient and appropriate usage of
> resources. This allows for
> > > > > recovery of any type of resource where usage is
> not in compliance with
> > > > > the RSA; to allow such resources to be
> reallocated for better usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance
> with the terms
> > > > outlined in
> > > > > the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned
> resources, but priority
> > > > > goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed
> shall be selected
> > > > > according to the following classes:
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3.1 Random
> > > > >
> > > > > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random
> between the members who has
> > > > > not been reviewed for any other reasons in the
> preceding 24 months.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3.2 Selected
> > > > >
> > > > > Member is selected because of an internal
> report or due to a lack of
> > > > > contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.3.3 Reported:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here, members are reviewed either because:
> > > > >
> > > > > A) They have requested the review themselves or
> > > > >
> > > > > B) There has been a community complaint made
> against them that
> > > > warrants
> > > > > investigation. Complaints shall be backed by
> evidence and AFRINIC
> > > > staff
> > > > > shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to
> conduct the review. However
> > > > > this review is not applicable to a member with
> the same resources
> > > > > portfolio on which a full review has been
> completed in the
> > > > preceding 24
> > > > > months.
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion,
> after having assessed the
> > > > > nature of the evidence found in the community
> complaint, require that
> > > > > such evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a
> sworn affidavit or
> > > > (ii)
> > > > > declared to be true before a Commissioner of
> Oath.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence
> has been established in
> > > > > accordance with:
> > > > >
> > > > > ? Breach of AFRINIC policies
> > > > > ? Breach of the provisions of the
> registration service agreement or
> > > > > other legal agreements between the organisation
> holding the
> > > > resource and
> > > > > AFRINIC.
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery
> process on the portion of
> > > > > addresses found to be noncompliant.
> > > > >
> > > > > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the
> organisation and correct any
> > > > > discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in cases of
> fraudulent resource
> > > > > acquisition or unlawful usage and abuse, the
> organization shall be
> > > > > given a minimum of six(6) months to effect the
> return of the
> > > > resources.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the organisation is cooperative and working
> in good faith to
> > > > > substantially restore compliance or has a valid
> need for
> > > > additional time
> > > > > to renumber out of the affected blocks, AFRINIC
> shall negotiate a
> > > > longer
> > > > > term.
> > > > >
> > > > > The acceptance level of compliance and duration
> of the longer term are
> > > > > at AFRINIC staff discretion.
> > > > >
> > > > > B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the
> member did not
> > > > transfer
> > > > > the resources to meet other AFRINIC-approved
> needs as per adopted
> > > > policies
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be
> recovered for a period of
> > > > > three (3) months; during which the organisation
> may at any time, seek
> > > > > compliance or transfer the resources to other
> members
> > > > >
> > > > > After this period, the resource shall be
> recovered and therefore the
> > > > > records of the previous holder of the recovered
> resource shall be
> > > > > updated in AFRINIC?s databases.
> > > > >
> > > > > C) Any Internet Number Resources recovered
> under this policy may be
> > > > > assigned/allocated under existing Allocation and
> Assignment Policies.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.5 Appeal procedure
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the
> right to appeal
> > > > against
> > > > > the results on the review within the four weeks
> following
> > > > communication
> > > > > of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall follow
> an arbitration process
> > > > > as provided for in the
> > > > > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil
> Procedure) of the Republic of
> > > > > Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an
> aggrieved party, suggest a
> > > > > pool of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable
> volunteers from the
> > > > > community.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.6 Compliance Report
> > > > >
> > > > > AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful
> report describing review
> > > > > activities, in accordance with all applicable
> laws and regulations.
> > > > >
> > > > > 13.7 Acknowledgements
> > > > >
> > > > > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri
> (become Afrinic GC
> > > > Chair), Mr
> > > > > Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member) and
> Mr Alain P. Aina for
> > > > > their contributions in the development of this
> Policy proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > > The authors also thank the community for the
> discussions and
> > > > contributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4.0 Revision History
> > > > >
> > > > > 18 May 2016
> > > > > Version 1.0
> > > > > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
> > > > > - Posted on RPD list
> > > > >
> > > > > 05 Aug 2016
> > > > > Version 2.0
> > > > > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
> > > > > - Change on the policy?s name
> > > > > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
> > > > > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
> > > > >
> > > > > 18 Nov 2016
> > > > > Version 3.0
> > > > > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
> > > > > - Update of section 3.3.3 from discussions on
> mailing list
> > > > > - Update of section 3.7 (Acknowledgements) to
> thank the community for
> > > > > discussions and contributions
> > > > >
> > > > > 11 Apr 2017
> > > > > Version 4.0
> > > > > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
> > > > > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
> > > > >
> > > > > 21 Oct. 2107
> > > > > Version 5.0
> > > > > - Fifth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
> > > > > - Adding the paragraph C to 13.3.3. according to
> the legal counsel
> > > > > proposition
> > > > > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.5 to comply with
> staff and legal
> > > > assessment
> > > > > - Rephrasing the paragraph 13.6 to comply with
> staff assessment and
> > > > > avoid any ambiguity
> > > > > - Changing the co-authors list
> > > > > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
> > > > > - Amending 13.4 (B) to reflect the Transfer
> policies
> > > > >
> > > > > 06 Apr. 2018
> > > > > Version 6.0
> > > > > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> > > > > - Removing categorisation between membership in
> random class
> > > > section 13.3.1
> > > > >
> > > > > 06 Apr. 2019
> > > > > Version 07
> > > > > - Seventh Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT07
> > > > > - Modifying section 13.4 Paragraph A) to clarify
> the resources
> > > > recovery
> > > > > process: set conditions under which a member
> could be given
> > > > longer term
> > > > > to effect the return of affected resources.
> > > > >
> > > > > 29 may. 2019
> > > > > Version 08
> > > > > - Eighth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
> > > > > - Section 13.3.1 changes to : "..The member is
> chosen by AFRINIC at
> > > > > random between the members who has not been
> reviewed for any other
> > > > > reasons in the preceding 24 months."
> > > > > - Section 13.4 last paragraph changes to :
> "AFRINIC shall initiate
> > > > > ... on the portion of addresses found to be
> noncompliant."
> > > > > - Section 13.5 changes to ?Reviewed members
> who are not satisfied
> > > > > have the right to appeal against the results on
> the review within the
> > > > > four weeks following communication of the
> results by AFRINIC??..?
> > > > > - Typos and grammatical errors fixed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > End
> > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________ RPD
> mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **********************************************
> > > > IPv4 is over
> > > > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > > > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > > > The IPv6 Company
> > > >
> > > > This electronic message contains information which may
> be privileged or
> > > > confidential. The information is intended to be for
> the exclusive use of
> > > > the individual(s) named above and further
> non-explicilty authorized
> > > > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
> contents of this
> > > > information, even if partially, including attached
> files, is strictly
> > > > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense.
> If you are not the
> > > > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution
> > > > or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including
> > > > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
> considered a criminal
> > > > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to
> inform about this
> > > > communication and delete it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > RPD mailing list
> > > > RPD at afrinic.net
> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RPD mailing list
> > > RPD at afrinic.net
> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > **********************************************
> > > IPv4 is over
> > > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > > The IPv6 Company
> > >
> > > This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
> exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > RPD mailing list
> > > RPD at afrinic.net
> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************
> > IPv4 is over
> > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > The IPv6 Company
> >
> > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190625/74c12f7b/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 195
> *************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/4f5a7d89/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list