Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Proposal update received: Multihoming not required for ASN
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Jun 19 10:56:27 UTC 2019
Then you think that AFRINIC should not have also an IPv6 PI policy?
How then those end-user organizations should are expected to run their networks?
Do you think they should be forced to renumber when they change ISP? And how they do multihoming if they have multiple ISPs?
El 19/6/19 12:33, "ikunda wakalele" <ikundawakalele at gmail.com> escribió:
Hello community members,
I am not understanding why we need to drop the requirement for multihoming for AFRINIC members.
We have large ISPs who are selling IP addresses to enterprise clients and we buy from AFRINIC.
Why would we need to compete with AFRINIC ?
Therefore this proposal does not make sense to me as it puts AFRINIC in a position to compete with its own members.
I do not support this proposal at all.
_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD